Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Req 3.2.1 - 3.2.5 and 3.3.6 - Evidential Documentation Narrative #39

Open
GunnisonConsulting opened this issue Feb 19, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@GunnisonConsulting
Copy link

Question about this U.S. Tax Court RFQ

Name and affiliation

Katie Peacock, Gunnison Consulting

Section, paragraph, or clause of RFQ documents

Req 3.2.1 - 3.2.5 and 3.3.6

Question

Government customers typically own artifacts created by contractors and offerors are not permitted to share. Please confirm that a written narrative is considered evidential documentation summarizing the work performed.

@GunnisonConsulting GunnisonConsulting added the question Further information is requested label Feb 19, 2025
@ustcclerk1
Copy link

In the case of open-source projects, artifacts must be provided. If the offeror isn’t permitted by the customer to share artifacts, the offeror may provide a written narrative or case study that preserves confidential information, but it must demonstrate the capability/experience being asked for in the requirement. If providing a written narrative, please include the associated contract number and a reference point of contact.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants