You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current statistical model assumes 100% clonality in the sample -- this is visibly making things worse than we would like, and so it is necessary to at least consider how subclonality will affect our data.
This is a very complex mathematical issue though, and if taken in a "clever but stupid" direction runs the risk of becoming ludicrously complex & non-convergent.
A simpler means of inference seems like it would be for the best -- some kind of marginalisation in the PDF?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The current statistical model assumes 100% clonality in the sample -- this is visibly making things worse than we would like, and so it is necessary to at least consider how subclonality will affect our data.
This is a very complex mathematical issue though, and if taken in a "clever but stupid" direction runs the risk of becoming ludicrously complex & non-convergent.
A simpler means of inference seems like it would be for the best -- some kind of marginalisation in the PDF?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: