Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: When editing a set for a synced ilvl, add the ability to choose 'fully synced' items that are 125 IL above #468

Open
VioletHynes opened this issue Jan 15, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@VioletHynes
Copy link
Contributor

VioletHynes commented Jan 15, 2025

Currently, when making a set for ultimates, it's very common for much of the general recommendation, part of BiS, or set to compare to BiS to have synced down items, i.e. any item 125 IL above the sync that has the same stats. It's possible to choose a specific item and xivgear will sync it correctly, but that can give the illusion that the set is recommending that specific item to someone less familiar with how IL sync works.

It'd be nice if there was a generic 'synced item' option, or perhaps when you choose any item that's synced down, it transforms (could be a transformation in view mode only) to show the minimum item level required and display all of the alt items.

In essence, I think this UX is really good for ultimates, and others agree (I've been asked a few times how I 'added synced items' for a set): https://xivgear.app/?page=sl%7Ca31944c3-a9ca-4839-ba67-2e3ec23dabb2 -- it especially works great with the alt items feature, and ultimates are a common thing to need to provide gear for. This viewing experience is already great, but it'd be even greater (and easier to author these sets) if synced items were more first-class.

I love the ultimate set UX for xivgear, especially being able to compare 'lazier' gearsets to BiS and this would really push it over the top to be even better.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant