Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add GlocalPQ #144

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

Add GlocalPQ #144

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

klamike
Copy link
Collaborator

@klamike klamike commented Nov 25, 2024

GlocalPQ is like Glocal but with independent (and identically distributed) local noise for the active/reactive load demands. This is implemented by sampling from d_η twice:

η₁ = rand(rng, d.d_η)
η₂ = rand(rng, d.d_η)
x₁ .= α .* η₁
x₂ .= α .* η₂
instead of once:
η = rand(rng, d.d_η)
x .= α .* η

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 25, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 92.30769% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/sampler/glocalpq.jl 89.28% 3 Missing ⚠️
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/sampler/load.jl 97.67% <100.00%> (+0.61%) ⬆️
src/sampler/sampler.jl 95.34% <ø> (ø)
src/sampler/glocalpq.jl 89.28% <89.28%> (ø)

@klamike
Copy link
Collaborator Author

klamike commented Dec 17, 2024

Closed in favor of the 2L approach in #148

@klamike klamike closed this Dec 17, 2024
@klamike klamike deleted the mk/pq branch December 18, 2024 00:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant