Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
more on commutator subgroups #2205
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
more on commutator subgroups #2205
Changes from 1 commit
0401dc0
822b916
fef4619
3ba228f
0b90793
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does this really require all three to be normal? Where is normality used in the proof?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When we precompose with a commutator the subgroup needs to be normal for the whole predicate to be a subgroup. We need the target to be a subgroup for the
subgroup_commutator_rec
lemma to be applied.I got this statement as exercise 5.1.5 in J.S. Robinson's "A Course In the Theory of Groups". There it is stated as all subgroups being normal, but it is not clear if that is necessary.
I can easily come up with counter examples where none of the subgroups are normal, but I haven't been able to come up with one where only one is non-normal.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I did a beefier search (with GAP) where 2 subgroups where normal and the other was not and I was not able to find any counter examples. I'll need to find some spare time to think about this more deeply.