Wrap 0D Fixed Bed TSA unit model in extra_models/fixed_bed_tsa0d for Flowsheet Processor UI

[dangunter]

Fixes

Documentation: https://idaes-pse.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reference_guides/model_libraries/models_extra/temperature_swing_adsorption/fixed_bed_tsa0d.html
Example: https://idaes-examples.readthedocs.io/en/latest/docs/flowsheets/temperature_swing_adsorption/temperature_swing_adsorption_doc.html

Summary/Motivation:

Initial UI wrapper for IDAES

Changes proposed in this PR:

• Wrap the model so it can be displayed in the Flowsheet Processor UI

Legal Acknowledgement

By contributing to this software project, I agree to the following terms and conditions for my contribution:

1. I agree my contributions are submitted under the license terms described in the LICENSE.txt file at the top level of this directory.
2. I represent I am authorized to make the contributions and grant the license. If my employer has rights to intellectual property that includes these contributions, I represent that I have received permission to make contributions and grant the required license on behalf of that employer.

[dangunter]

One issue I see immediately is that the "model options" for the TSA has a number of values and they will probably be changed at the same time / along with the model's other parameters and variables. However currently the UI sets these options in different, initial step, as shown by this screenshot for a watertap model:

This is, imho not ideal. We should have these sorts of model options more included in the main configuration page, even though they are not Pyomo vars.

@Daison2102 Do I have this roughly right about the FixedBedTSA0D model class?
@sspoon, @MichaelPesce thoughts on the design?

[MichaelPesce]

@dangunter the original purpose of those options were to allow for pre-build configurations, so it had made sense to be able to view them before running the build. however, they should also be available from the main workflow (after build step), where the model can be re-built with different model configurations

[dangunter]

@MichaelPesce ok, though I think it might be better to have them as normal parameters

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 96.38554% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 76.85%. Comparing base (ce941ce) to head (25a485d).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...temperature_swing_adsorption/fixed_bed_tsa0d_ui.py	96.34%	1 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1493      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   77.06%   76.85%   -0.22%     
==========================================
  Files         389      394       +5     
  Lines       62709    63231     +522     
  Branches    10280    10354      +74     
==========================================
+ Hits        48329    48594     +265     
- Misses      11941    12194     +253     
- Partials     2439     2443       +4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.