-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 344
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Issue 295/docker images dont work #312
Issue 295/docker images dont work #312
Conversation
WalkthroughThe update introduces a new image provider in a Nuxt.js application, controlled by an environment variable. It modifies the Docker build process to include a new Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 1
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (6)
- Dockerfile (1 hunks)
- client/.env.docker (1 hunks)
- client/lib/null-image-provider.js (1 hunks)
- client/nuxt.config.ts (1 hunks)
- client/runtimeConfig.js (1 hunks)
- docker/nuxt-wrapper.sh (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 5
client/lib/null-image-provider.js (1)
- 1-22: Ensure that
useRuntimeConfig
is safely used, especially in the context of server-side rendering, to avoid leaking sensitive information. Also, confirm that the external dependenciesufo
and#image
are properly managed and compatible with the project's setup.client/runtimeConfig.js (2)
- 15-17: Confirm that the new
useNullImageProvider
configuration is correctly implemented and tested across the application to ensure it behaves as expected when the environment variable is set toyes
.- 18-18: Ensure that the updated logic for
SENTRY_TRACES_SAMPLE_RATE
and other Sentry-related configurations are correctly implemented and do not introduce any unintended side effects, especially in terms of error reporting and performance monitoring.client/nuxt.config.ts (1)
- 67-78: Ensure that the conditional assignment within the
image
property is correctly implemented and tested. Verify that the null image provider is properly integrated and that the fallback to default image quality settings works as expected when the environment variable is not set toyes
.Dockerfile (1)
- 17-17: Confirm that the step to copy
.env.docker
to.env
during the build process is correctly implemented and does not introduce any build or runtime issues. Ensure that the.env
file is correctly used by the application within the Docker container.
|
||
. env.sh | ||
eval $(sed 's/^/export /' < /app/client/.env) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Using eval
to export environment variables from the .env
file poses a security risk if the .env
file contains untrusted input. Consider using a safer method to parse and export environment variables.
This patch de-activates sharp image processing on docker builds, bypassing issues using ipx/sharp in cross-platform builds.
Summary by CodeRabbit