Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix small condition #320

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 14, 2024
Merged

fix small condition #320

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 14, 2024

Conversation

formsdev
Copy link
Collaborator

@formsdev formsdev commented Feb 14, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Updated the logic for displaying field options to correctly handle empty states.

@formsdev formsdev requested a review from JhumanJ February 14, 2024 08:49
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 14, 2024

Walkthrough

The update involves a modification to the logic within a Vue component related to handling field options. Specifically, the change alters the condition under which an empty string is returned by the optionsText method. Previously, an empty string was returned if a certain condition was true; now, it returns an empty string when that condition is false, indicating a more cautious approach to handling potentially undefined or null field values.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.../open/forms/fields/components/FieldOptions.vue Modified the optionsText method to return an empty string when !this.field[this.field.type] is met, reversing the previous condition.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 4

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 26825d5 and 9054f46.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • client/components/open/forms/fields/components/FieldOptions.vue (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 2
client/components/open/forms/fields/components/FieldOptions.vue (2)
  • 471-471: The condition !this.field[this.field.type] is used to return an empty string when the field type is not defined or falsy. Ensure this logic aligns with the expected behavior for all field types and does not inadvertently suppress valid options.
  • 468-474: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-1]

Verify that all event handlers such as onFieldDisabledChange, onFieldRequiredChange, etc., properly handle edge cases and potential errors, especially when interacting with external or asynchronous sources.

Comment on lines 468 to 474
return true
},
optionsText () {
if (this.field[this.field.type]) return ''
if (!this.field[this.field.type]) return ''
return this.field[this.field.type].options.map(option => {
return option.name
}).join('\n')
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-1]

Ensure the component is properly documented, including props, computed properties, and methods, to improve maintainability and understandability for future developers.


📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-1]

Consider optimizing the component by reviewing computed properties and methods for any unnecessary computations or redundant code to enhance performance.


📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-1]

Review the use of v-if directives for conditional rendering in the template. Ensure that they are used efficiently to prevent unnecessary DOM manipulations and re-renders.


📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-1]

Check for consistent naming conventions and coding styles throughout the component to maintain code quality and readability.

@JhumanJ JhumanJ merged commit 46ebf2e into main Feb 14, 2024
4 checks passed
@JhumanJ JhumanJ deleted the fix-small-condition branch February 14, 2024 12:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants