Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: signed url for webhooks #325

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 20, 2024
Merged

Conversation

madassdev
Copy link
Collaborator

@madassdev madassdev commented Feb 20, 2024

Adds a signed url for files in webhook links

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Improved data handling in webhooks by enhancing method chaining for file URL signing and showing hidden fields.

@madassdev madassdev requested a review from formsdev February 20, 2024 11:40
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 20, 2024

Walkthrough

The update involves enhancing the AbstractWebhookHandler by refining the getWebhookData method. This method now incorporates chained calls to useSignedUrlForFiles and showHiddenFields on the FormSubmissionFormatter instance, aiming to improve data handling and presentation in webhooks. This change streamlines the process of formatting webhook data, allowing for more customizable and secure data transmission.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
app/Service/Forms/Webhooks/.../AbstractWebhookHandler.php Modified getWebhookData to chain useSignedUrlForFiles and showHiddenFields on FormSubmissionFormatter.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 3

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3fd5077 and 182f57e.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/Service/Forms/Webhooks/AbstractWebhookHandler.php (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 1
app/Service/Forms/Webhooks/AbstractWebhookHandler.php (1)
  • 28-30: The chaining of useSignedUrlForFiles() and showHiddenFields() methods on the FormSubmissionFormatter instance is a clear and concise way to apply multiple configurations to the formatter. This approach is good for readability and maintainability. However, ensure that both methods useSignedUrlForFiles and showHiddenFields are implemented in the FormSubmissionFormatter class and that they return $this to allow for method chaining.

Comment on lines +28 to +31
$formatter = (new FormSubmissionFormatter($this->form, $this->data))
->useSignedUrlForFiles()
->showHiddenFields()
;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

While the addition of signed URLs and the option to show hidden fields are valuable features, it's important to consider the security implications of these changes. Specifically, ensure that the implementation of useSignedUrlForFiles securely generates signed URLs with an appropriate expiration time to minimize the risk of unauthorized access. Additionally, the use of showHiddenFields should be carefully controlled to avoid inadvertently exposing sensitive information in webhook payloads.


The formatting and preparation of the webhook payload data seem to be handled well, with a clear separation of concerns and a focus on readability. However, it would be beneficial to add error handling around the FormSubmissionFormatter operations, especially if there's a possibility of exceptions or errors during the URL signing process or when fetching fields with values. This would ensure the robustness of the webhook handling mechanism.


The implementation of the getWebhookData method appears to be modular and extendable, which is a good practice. However, consider documenting the expected structure of the $data array and any assumptions made about the presence of keys like submission_id. This documentation will help future developers understand the data requirements and facilitate easier debugging and extension of the webhook functionality.

@JhumanJ JhumanJ merged commit e8aa1ac into main Feb 20, 2024
4 checks passed
@JhumanJ JhumanJ deleted the ddde5-fix-signed-url-on-webhooks branch February 20, 2024 11:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants