Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug when editing submissions - file input #357

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 22, 2024

Conversation

formsdev
Copy link
Collaborator

@formsdev formsdev commented Mar 22, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Improved the file upload component for better usability and maintainability.

@formsdev formsdev requested a review from JhumanJ March 22, 2024 06:43
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 22, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent update focuses on refining the file upload component within the client's interface. It entails a comprehensive overhaul of the template's structure, class bindings, and event handling mechanisms. The primary goal is to enhance the component's functionality, streamline its operation, and bolster code maintainability. This is achieved through meticulous reorganization of class definitions, optimization of event listeners, and improvements in file upload processes, ensuring a more efficient and user-friendly experience.

Changes

File(s) Summary of Changes
client/.../FileInput.vue Refactored template structure, adjusted class bindings, simplified event handling, and improved code readability for better functionality and maintainability.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 31e5624 and b307e6b.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • client/components/forms/FileInput.vue (7 hunks)
Additional comments: 6
client/components/forms/FileInput.vue (6)
  • 7-12: The dynamic class bindings for handling different states (disabled, uploadDragoverEvent, loading) are implemented correctly. However, for better readability, consider refactoring the class bindings into a computed property. This approach can make the template cleaner and the logic behind class bindings more centralized and easier to maintain.
  • 21-25: The implementation of the hidden file input and the rendering of the uploaded file list using the uploaded-file component is well-done. The conditional UI elements based on the loading state and the presence of files are correctly implemented, enhancing the user experience.
  • 57-63: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [60-74]

The import statements and component registration in the script section are correctly implemented. The use of useFormInput, InputWrapper, UploadedFile, and storeFile is appropriate for the component's functionality. The props are well-defined, and the setup function is correctly utilized.

  • 104-116: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [87-113]

The computed properties and watcher for files are well-implemented, providing necessary dynamic behavior. However, in the created lifecycle hook, consider adding error handling for the asynchronous operations involved in fetching files from URLs. This can improve robustness and user experience by gracefully handling failures.

  • 135-168: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [138-205]

The methods for handling file uploads and interactions are well-structured and cover the necessary functionality. However, in the uploadFileToServer method, consider providing more detailed error feedback to the user when the upload fails. This can enhance the user experience by making it clearer why an upload did not succeed.

  • 205-216: The utility methods getFileFromUrl and getFileSrc are correctly implemented for their respective purposes. However, consider adding error handling in the getFileFromUrl method to gracefully handle network errors or invalid URLs. This can improve the robustness of the component and the user experience.

@JhumanJ JhumanJ merged commit 0fe038d into main Mar 22, 2024
5 checks passed
@JhumanJ JhumanJ deleted the 37dc7-bug-when-editing-submissions branch March 22, 2024 08:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants