Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Object.hasOwn & hasOwnProperty replace with lodash has #367

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 3, 2024

Conversation

chiragchhatrala
Copy link
Collaborator

@chiragchhatrala chiragchhatrala commented Apr 2, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Enhanced property existence checks across various components for improved maintainability by utilizing a consistent method from an external library.

@chiragchhatrala chiragchhatrala requested a review from JhumanJ April 2, 2024 18:15
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 2, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent update focuses on enhancing codebase maintainability by standardizing the method for checking property existence across various components and mixins. By importing and utilizing _has from 'lodash/has', the update replaces direct hasOwnProperty checks. This shift not only streamlines the code but also ensures consistency and reliability in property checking throughout the application's components.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.../useFormInput.js, .../OpenCompleteForm.vue, .../OpenFormField.vue, .../FormUrlPrefill.vue, .../input.js Imported _has from 'lodash/has' for checking property existence, replacing direct hasOwnProperty checks.
.../Badge.vue, .../Modal.vue, .../FormEditorPreview.vue, .../FormInformation.vue, .../FormBlockLogicEditor.vue, .../FieldOptions.vue, .../OpenTable.vue Updated imports to use _has for consistent property checking; replaced hasOwnProperty with _has.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Status

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 615ac88 and c2fb8a4.
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • client/components/vendor/FeatureBase.vue is excluded by !**/vendor/**
Files selected for processing (12)
  • client/components/forms/useFormInput.js (2 hunks)
  • client/components/global/Badge.vue (2 hunks)
  • client/components/global/Modal.vue (3 hunks)
  • client/components/open/forms/OpenCompleteForm.vue (2 hunks)
  • client/components/open/forms/OpenFormField.vue (2 hunks)
  • client/components/open/forms/components/FormUrlPrefill.vue (2 hunks)
  • client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormEditorPreview.vue (2 hunks)
  • client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormInformation.vue (2 hunks)
  • client/components/open/forms/components/form-logic-components/FormBlockLogicEditor.vue (3 hunks)
  • client/components/open/forms/fields/components/FieldOptions.vue (2 hunks)
  • client/components/open/tables/OpenTable.vue (4 hunks)
  • client/mixins/forms/input.js (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (27)
client/components/global/Badge.vue (2)

10-10: The import statement for _has from 'lodash/has' is correctly implemented.


40-40: The usage of _has for checking the existence of props.color in baseClasses is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives.

client/mixins/forms/input.js (2)

2-2: The import statement for _has from 'lodash/has' is correctly implemented.


35-35: The usage of _has for checking the existence of errors in this.form is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives.

client/components/open/forms/components/FormUrlPrefill.vue (2)

22-22: The import statement for _has from 'lodash/has' is correctly implemented.


44-44: The usage of _has for checking the existence of property.id in props.formData is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives.

client/components/forms/useFormInput.js (2)

5-5: The import statement for _has from 'lodash/has' is correctly implemented.


35-35: The usage of _has for checking the existence of errors in props.form is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives.

client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormEditorPreview.vue (2)

65-65: The import statement for _has from 'lodash/has' is correctly implemented.


93-93: The usage of _has for checking the existence of id in this.form is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives.

client/components/global/Modal.vue (3)

56-56: The import statement for _has from 'lodash/has' is correctly implemented.


23-33: The usage of _has for checking the existence of 'icon' and 'title' slots is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives.


45-45: The usage of _has for checking the existence of 'footer' slot is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives.

client/components/open/forms/components/form-logic-components/FormBlockLogicEditor.vue (3)

73-73: The import statement for _has from 'lodash/has' is correctly implemented.


104-104: The usage of _has for checking the existence of 'logic' property in fields is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives.


170-170: The usage of _has for checking the existence of 'logic' property in this.field during component mount is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives.

client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormInformation.vue (2)

72-72: The import statement for _has from 'lodash/has' is correctly implemented.


155-155: The usage of _has for checking the existence of properties in copyForm before deletion is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives.

client/components/open/forms/OpenCompleteForm.vue (2)

121-121: Consider adding a brief comment above the lodash import to explain why lodash's _has is preferred over the native Object.hasOwn or hasOwnProperty methods. This can help maintainers understand the choice, especially in terms of handling edge cases or ensuring consistency across environments.


159-159: The use of lodash's _has for checking if this.form.theme exists in this.themes is a good practice for consistency and reliability across different environments. However, ensure that lodash is included in the project dependencies to avoid any runtime errors.

client/components/open/tables/OpenTable.vue (3)

24-24: Replacing $slots.hasOwnProperty('actions') with _has($slots, 'actions') is a good improvement for consistency and reliability, especially when dealing with prototype chain issues. Good job on ensuring the codebase uses a consistent approach for property checks.


74-74: Adding a comment above the lodash import explaining the choice of lodash's _has over native methods could be beneficial for future maintainers. It's always good to provide context for such decisions.


178-178: The replacement of col.hasOwnProperty with _has(col, ...) in various places within the component is a solid choice for enhancing code consistency and handling edge cases more gracefully. Just ensure lodash is properly included in your project's dependencies.

Also applies to: 184-184, 189-189, 199-199

client/components/open/forms/OpenFormField.vue (2)

59-59: It's a good practice to add a brief comment explaining why lodash's _has is used over the native JavaScript methods for property existence checks. This can help future maintainers understand the decision, especially in terms of handling edge cases or ensuring consistency.


252-252: Using lodash's _has for checking if field has a property named field.type is a good approach for consistency and reliability. This change aligns with the PR's objective to standardize property existence checks across the codebase. Well done.

client/components/open/forms/fields/components/FieldOptions.vue (2)

319-319: Adding a comment above the lodash import to explain the choice of lodash's _has over native JavaScript methods could be beneficial for future maintainers. It's always good to provide context for such decisions.


560-560: The use of lodash's _has in the setDefaultFieldValues method to check for the existence of properties in this.field is a good practice for consistency and reliability. This aligns with the PR's objective to standardize property existence checks across the codebase. Nicely done.

Copy link
Owner

@JhumanJ JhumanJ left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CleanShot 2024-04-03 at 10 35 18

Submissions table not working, please check again this and other usage

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Status

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c2fb8a4 and 19bab24.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • client/components/open/tables/OpenTable.vue (5 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • client/components/open/tables/OpenTable.vue

@JhumanJ JhumanJ merged commit a751725 into main Apr 3, 2024
5 checks passed
@JhumanJ JhumanJ deleted the f3e50-object.hasown-replace branch April 3, 2024 09:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants