-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 344
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Object.hasOwn & hasOwnProperty replace with lodash has #367
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent update focuses on enhancing codebase maintainability by standardizing the method for checking property existence across various components and mixins. By importing and utilizing Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
client/components/vendor/FeatureBase.vue
is excluded by!**/vendor/**
Files selected for processing (12)
- client/components/forms/useFormInput.js (2 hunks)
- client/components/global/Badge.vue (2 hunks)
- client/components/global/Modal.vue (3 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/OpenCompleteForm.vue (2 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/OpenFormField.vue (2 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/components/FormUrlPrefill.vue (2 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormEditorPreview.vue (2 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormInformation.vue (2 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/components/form-logic-components/FormBlockLogicEditor.vue (3 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/fields/components/FieldOptions.vue (2 hunks)
- client/components/open/tables/OpenTable.vue (4 hunks)
- client/mixins/forms/input.js (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (27)
client/components/global/Badge.vue (2)
10-10
: The import statement for_has
from 'lodash/has' is correctly implemented.
40-40
: The usage of_has
for checking the existence ofprops.color
inbaseClasses
is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives.client/mixins/forms/input.js (2)
2-2
: The import statement for_has
from 'lodash/has' is correctly implemented.
35-35
: The usage of_has
for checking the existence oferrors
inthis.form
is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives.client/components/open/forms/components/FormUrlPrefill.vue (2)
22-22
: The import statement for_has
from 'lodash/has' is correctly implemented.
44-44
: The usage of_has
for checking the existence ofproperty.id
inprops.formData
is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives.client/components/forms/useFormInput.js (2)
5-5
: The import statement for_has
from 'lodash/has' is correctly implemented.
35-35
: The usage of_has
for checking the existence oferrors
inprops.form
is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives.client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormEditorPreview.vue (2)
65-65
: The import statement for_has
from 'lodash/has' is correctly implemented.
93-93
: The usage of_has
for checking the existence ofid
inthis.form
is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives.client/components/global/Modal.vue (3)
56-56
: The import statement for_has
from 'lodash/has' is correctly implemented.
23-33
: The usage of_has
for checking the existence of 'icon' and 'title' slots is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives.
45-45
: The usage of_has
for checking the existence of 'footer' slot is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives.client/components/open/forms/components/form-logic-components/FormBlockLogicEditor.vue (3)
73-73
: The import statement for_has
from 'lodash/has' is correctly implemented.
104-104
: The usage of_has
for checking the existence of 'logic' property in fields is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives.
170-170
: The usage of_has
for checking the existence of 'logic' property inthis.field
during component mount is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives.client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormInformation.vue (2)
72-72
: The import statement for_has
from 'lodash/has' is correctly implemented.
155-155
: The usage of_has
for checking the existence of properties incopyForm
before deletion is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives.client/components/open/forms/OpenCompleteForm.vue (2)
121-121
: Consider adding a brief comment above the lodash import to explain why lodash's_has
is preferred over the nativeObject.hasOwn
orhasOwnProperty
methods. This can help maintainers understand the choice, especially in terms of handling edge cases or ensuring consistency across environments.
159-159
: The use of lodash's_has
for checking ifthis.form.theme
exists inthis.themes
is a good practice for consistency and reliability across different environments. However, ensure that lodash is included in the project dependencies to avoid any runtime errors.client/components/open/tables/OpenTable.vue (3)
24-24
: Replacing$slots.hasOwnProperty('actions')
with_has($slots, 'actions')
is a good improvement for consistency and reliability, especially when dealing with prototype chain issues. Good job on ensuring the codebase uses a consistent approach for property checks.
74-74
: Adding a comment above the lodash import explaining the choice of lodash's_has
over native methods could be beneficial for future maintainers. It's always good to provide context for such decisions.
178-178
: The replacement ofcol.hasOwnProperty
with_has(col, ...)
in various places within the component is a solid choice for enhancing code consistency and handling edge cases more gracefully. Just ensure lodash is properly included in your project's dependencies.Also applies to: 184-184, 189-189, 199-199
client/components/open/forms/OpenFormField.vue (2)
59-59
: It's a good practice to add a brief comment explaining why lodash's_has
is used over the native JavaScript methods for property existence checks. This can help future maintainers understand the decision, especially in terms of handling edge cases or ensuring consistency.
252-252
: Using lodash's_has
for checking iffield
has a property namedfield.type
is a good approach for consistency and reliability. This change aligns with the PR's objective to standardize property existence checks across the codebase. Well done.client/components/open/forms/fields/components/FieldOptions.vue (2)
319-319
: Adding a comment above the lodash import to explain the choice of lodash's_has
over native JavaScript methods could be beneficial for future maintainers. It's always good to provide context for such decisions.
560-560
: The use of lodash's_has
in thesetDefaultFieldValues
method to check for the existence of properties inthis.field
is a good practice for consistency and reliability. This aligns with the PR's objective to standardize property existence checks across the codebase. Nicely done.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- client/components/open/tables/OpenTable.vue (5 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- client/components/open/tables/OpenTable.vue
Summary by CodeRabbit