Object.hasOwn & hasOwnProperty replace with lodash has #367
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent update focuses on enhancing codebase maintainability by standardizing the method for checking property existence across various components and mixins. By importing and utilizing Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
client/components/vendor/FeatureBase.vueis excluded by!**/vendor/**
Files selected for processing (12)
- client/components/forms/useFormInput.js (2 hunks)
- client/components/global/Badge.vue (2 hunks)
- client/components/global/Modal.vue (3 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/OpenCompleteForm.vue (2 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/OpenFormField.vue (2 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/components/FormUrlPrefill.vue (2 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormEditorPreview.vue (2 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormInformation.vue (2 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/components/form-logic-components/FormBlockLogicEditor.vue (3 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/fields/components/FieldOptions.vue (2 hunks)
- client/components/open/tables/OpenTable.vue (4 hunks)
- client/mixins/forms/input.js (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (27)
client/components/global/Badge.vue (2)
10-10: The import statement for_hasfrom 'lodash/has' is correctly implemented.
40-40: The usage of_hasfor checking the existence ofprops.colorinbaseClassesis correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives.client/mixins/forms/input.js (2)
2-2: The import statement for_hasfrom 'lodash/has' is correctly implemented.
35-35: The usage of_hasfor checking the existence oferrorsinthis.formis correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives.client/components/open/forms/components/FormUrlPrefill.vue (2)
22-22: The import statement for_hasfrom 'lodash/has' is correctly implemented.
44-44: The usage of_hasfor checking the existence ofproperty.idinprops.formDatais correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives.client/components/forms/useFormInput.js (2)
5-5: The import statement for_hasfrom 'lodash/has' is correctly implemented.
35-35: The usage of_hasfor checking the existence oferrorsinprops.formis correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives.client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormEditorPreview.vue (2)
65-65: The import statement for_hasfrom 'lodash/has' is correctly implemented.
93-93: The usage of_hasfor checking the existence ofidinthis.formis correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives.client/components/global/Modal.vue (3)
56-56: The import statement for_hasfrom 'lodash/has' is correctly implemented.
23-33: The usage of_hasfor checking the existence of 'icon' and 'title' slots is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives.
45-45: The usage of_hasfor checking the existence of 'footer' slot is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives.client/components/open/forms/components/form-logic-components/FormBlockLogicEditor.vue (3)
73-73: The import statement for_hasfrom 'lodash/has' is correctly implemented.
104-104: The usage of_hasfor checking the existence of 'logic' property in fields is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives.
170-170: The usage of_hasfor checking the existence of 'logic' property inthis.fieldduring component mount is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives.client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormInformation.vue (2)
72-72: The import statement for_hasfrom 'lodash/has' is correctly implemented.
155-155: The usage of_hasfor checking the existence of properties incopyFormbefore deletion is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives.client/components/open/forms/OpenCompleteForm.vue (2)
121-121: Consider adding a brief comment above the lodash import to explain why lodash's_hasis preferred over the nativeObject.hasOwnorhasOwnPropertymethods. This can help maintainers understand the choice, especially in terms of handling edge cases or ensuring consistency across environments.
159-159: The use of lodash's_hasfor checking ifthis.form.themeexists inthis.themesis a good practice for consistency and reliability across different environments. However, ensure that lodash is included in the project dependencies to avoid any runtime errors.client/components/open/tables/OpenTable.vue (3)
24-24: Replacing$slots.hasOwnProperty('actions')with_has($slots, 'actions')is a good improvement for consistency and reliability, especially when dealing with prototype chain issues. Good job on ensuring the codebase uses a consistent approach for property checks.
74-74: Adding a comment above the lodash import explaining the choice of lodash's_hasover native methods could be beneficial for future maintainers. It's always good to provide context for such decisions.
178-178: The replacement ofcol.hasOwnPropertywith_has(col, ...)in various places within the component is a solid choice for enhancing code consistency and handling edge cases more gracefully. Just ensure lodash is properly included in your project's dependencies.Also applies to: 184-184, 189-189, 199-199
client/components/open/forms/OpenFormField.vue (2)
59-59: It's a good practice to add a brief comment explaining why lodash's_hasis used over the native JavaScript methods for property existence checks. This can help future maintainers understand the decision, especially in terms of handling edge cases or ensuring consistency.
252-252: Using lodash's_hasfor checking iffieldhas a property namedfield.typeis a good approach for consistency and reliability. This change aligns with the PR's objective to standardize property existence checks across the codebase. Well done.client/components/open/forms/fields/components/FieldOptions.vue (2)
319-319: Adding a comment above the lodash import to explain the choice of lodash's_hasover native JavaScript methods could be beneficial for future maintainers. It's always good to provide context for such decisions.
560-560: The use of lodash's_hasin thesetDefaultFieldValuesmethod to check for the existence of properties inthis.fieldis a good practice for consistency and reliability. This aligns with the PR's objective to standardize property existence checks across the codebase. Nicely done.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- client/components/open/tables/OpenTable.vue (5 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- client/components/open/tables/OpenTable.vue
Summary by CodeRabbit