Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

python3Packages.zarr: 3.0.1 -> 2.18.3 #380002

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 12, 2025

Conversation

bcdarwin
Copy link
Member

@bcdarwin bcdarwin commented Feb 7, 2025

This reverts commit d63c6c9.

Most dependencies of zarr are broken by the 3.x bump. [This is due to lack of upstream support, not due to old versions in Nixpkgs.]
See #373248 for an incomplete list.

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@dotlambda
Copy link
Member

You might want to set passthru.skipBulkUpdate = true (and remove that line again in #373248).

@dotlambda dotlambda merged commit 7379723 into NixOS:master Feb 12, 2025
20 of 24 checks passed
@bcdarwin bcdarwin deleted the python3-revert-zarr-update branch February 12, 2025 20:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants