Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

C9 test development #1432

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Feb 23, 2025

Conversation

Phinhas214
Copy link
Contributor

@Phinhas214 Phinhas214 commented Feb 23, 2025

Description

Added a test case C9 for the conversion procedure (from Fahrenheit to Widget). @Phinhas214, @aaronlui415, and @shesophast were working on this as new developers.

Partially addresses #962

Type of change

  • Note merging this changes the database configuration.
  • This change requires a documentation update

Checklist

  • I have followed the OED pull request ideas
  • I have removed text in ( ) from the issue request
  • You acknowledge that every person contributing to this work has signed the OED Contributing License Agreement and each author is listed in the Description section.

Limitations

Only addresses test case C9.

Phinhas Asmelash and others added 6 commits February 14, 2025 01:00
Co-authored-by: Sophia Alexander <sophiagrace23@g.ucla.edu>
Co-authored-by: Aaron Lui <aaronluii15@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sophia Alexander <sophiagrace23@g.ucla.edu>
Co-authored-by: Aaron Lui <aaronluii15@gmail.com>
@Chocopepero
Copy link
Contributor

Congrats to @Phinhas214, @aaronlui415, and @shesophast on submitting your first Pull Request! All students have signed the CLA. The test case looks good. Just need a final approval from @huss and it's good to merge.

I accidentally forgot to use the reversed conversion in the design doc.
This fixes the test case to do that. This is not the doing of the developers.
@huss
Copy link
Member

huss commented Feb 23, 2025

I made a mistake in the design document and did not reverse the conversion (used c2 instead of c6). I realized this during my review of this PR. I have pushed a commit to fix this since it was my fault. The original work was fine and correctly implemented what was then in the design document.

Copy link
Member

@huss huss left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Chocopepero review is taken as approving. Everything looks good. Congratulations to @Phinhas214, @aaronlui415 & @shesophast on their first accepted contribution to OED.

@huss huss merged commit 58bef6d into OpenEnergyDashboard:development Feb 23, 2025
3 checks passed
@Phinhas214 Phinhas214 deleted the C9_test_development branch February 23, 2025 19:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants