Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(api): Hookup meniscus-relative pipette in Liquid-Classes for internal testing #17446

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: edge
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

andySigler
Copy link
Contributor

@andySigler andySigler commented Feb 6, 2025

Overview

Tested and works on a robot.

Pipette testing (%CV and %D) requires meniscus-relative positioning for repeatable performance.

Test Plan and Hands on Testing

Changelog

Review requests

Risk assessment

@andySigler andySigler changed the title enable meniscus-relative pipette during transfer-liquid for hw testing chore(api): Hookup meniscus-relative pipette in Liquid-Classes for internal testing Feb 13, 2025
@andySigler andySigler marked this pull request as ready for review February 13, 2025 10:43
@andySigler andySigler requested a review from a team as a code owner February 13, 2025 10:43
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 13, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 26.16%. Comparing base (aeb64ff) to head (be213f1).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             edge   #17446   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   26.16%   26.16%           
=======================================
  Files        2835     2835           
  Lines      217655   217655           
  Branches     9274     9274           
=======================================
  Hits        56944    56944           
  Misses     160694   160694           
  Partials       17       17           
Flag Coverage Δ
protocol-designer 18.84% <ø> (ø)
step-generation 4.34% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@andySigler andySigler removed the request for review from ryanthecoder February 13, 2025 15:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant