Rework source IDs to include all information for citations

[znichollscr]

Description

Checklist

Please confirm that this pull request has done the following:

• Documentation added (where applicable)
• Changelog item added to changelog/

[znichollscr]

@jitendra-kumar would this put all the information you desire in the CVs?

[znichollscr]

x-ref #201, which has the full background/discussion behind this in the clearest form I could think of

[znichollscr]

@jitendra-kumar I know there has been a lot of activity in this repo. I think this is the key question for #177 now though so if you have any thoughts, please let me know. Thanks!

[jitendra-kumar]

Yes these changes look great and provides all we need.

[znichollscr]

@durack1 let's just go with this? Rationale: we can figure out how this plugs into the wider CVs as part of #201

[github-actions]

No changes to the database between 'main' branch and 939125a

[znichollscr]

Yes these changes look great and provides all we need

Ok cool. Is this the form of source ID that is being envisaged in other projects? (Maybe better to chime in on #201 with any reply)

[durack1]

Yes, this project is the small volume, and comparatively simple test case, so let's learn by doing..

The CMIPx projects are more complex, far larger author lists, reuse of models/source_id's across institution_id's, more information being captured in the CVs, etc. I think keeping this as simple as is necessary is key, with an attempt of being simple and nimble so we satisfy the minimum requirements for OSTI DOIs and nothing more at this stage

[znichollscr]

Sounds good. Let's see what comes out of #201