Test: Added test file for src/graphql/types/Venue/updater.ts #3300
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request refactors the resolver for the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🧰 Additional context used🧠 Learnings (1)test/graphql/types/Venue/updater.test.ts (1)🔇 Additional comments (17)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #3300 +/- ##
====================================================
+ Coverage 48.57% 48.76% +0.19%
====================================================
Files 458 458
Lines 34489 34492 +3
Branches 971 984 +13
====================================================
+ Hits 16752 16819 +67
+ Misses 17737 17673 -64 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/graphql/types/Venue/updater.test.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
test/graphql/types/Venue/updater.test.ts (1)
Learnt from: yugal07
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3253
File: test/graphql/types/Event/updater.test.ts:139-162
Timestamp: 2025-02-23T16:10:02.480Z
Learning: In test files, prefer keeping mock data separate for each test case instead of extracting common mock objects, as it provides better test isolation and makes future modifications easier without affecting other tests.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Run tests for talawa api
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
test/graphql/types/Venue/updater.test.ts (9)
1-7: Well-organized imports and dependenciesThe imports are well-structured, including all necessary dependencies for testing the resolver function. Good job importing only what's needed and organizing them logically.
8-15: Good use of interfaces for type safetyThe
CurrentClientinterface is well-defined and provides good type safety for the authentication context needed in the tests.
16-47: Comprehensive mock setupThe mock setup is thorough and covers all necessary components for testing. The Fastify instance, reply, and context mocks include all required methods and properties.
49-63: Well-structured test suite with proper setupThe test suite follows best practices with a descriptive name and proper use of
beforeEachto reset the test state, preventing test interdependency issues.
65-81: Authentication test case is well implementedThis test correctly verifies that unauthenticated users receive the appropriate error. The error assertion is properly structured with the expected code.
97-109: Consider using separate mock data for each testBased on the retrieved learnings, it's better to keep mock data separate for each test case instead of extracting common objects. Your current approach aligns with this recommendation - continue creating fresh mock objects in each test for better isolation.
Also applies to: 111-127
181-200: Well-implemented test for different updater scenarioThis test case effectively verifies the behavior when the updater is different from the current user. The sequential database call mocking is implemented correctly.
242-276: Excellent implementation of database query verificationThis test goes beyond simple mock assertions to verify that the database is queried with the correct parameters. The custom mock implementation effectively tests the internal behavior of the resolver.
1-277: Comprehensive test coverage for the updater resolverOverall, this test file provides excellent coverage of the
resolveUpdaterfunction. You've covered authentication checks, authorization for different user roles, edge cases like missing updaters, and implementation details like database queries.The tests are well-structured, isolated, and follow best practices for maintainability.
|
@palisadoes I added 2 more test cases, now the test coverage is almost 100%, also coderabbit approves the PR. |
PratapRathi
force-pushed
the
Test/src-graphql-types-Venue-updater.ts
branch
from
5a623af to
6fc60de
Compare
|
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
|
@disha1202 @palisadoes Please review this PR. |
noman2002
merged commit 9852b7d
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
This PR will add the test file containing the test cases for
src/graphql/types/Venue/updater.ts.Issue Number:
#3077
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
N/A
Summary
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Checklist
CodeRabbit AI Review
Test Coverage
Other information
No
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
Refactor
Tests