Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reco-3: add checks for parameters in function callTargets #82

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 26, 2024

Conversation

ksatyarth2
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@ksatyarth2 ksatyarth2 self-assigned this Nov 22, 2024
@ksatyarth2 ksatyarth2 requested a review from bxmmm1 November 22, 2024 09:23
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 22, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
mainnet-contracts/src/PufferRevenueDepositor.sol 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
mainnet-contracts/src/PufferRevenueDepositor.sol 92.30% <0.00%> (-4.99%) ⬇️

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes


🚨 Try these New Features:

@bxmmm1 bxmmm1 merged commit d1b9e55 into feat/audit-report-vt Nov 26, 2024
bxmmm1 added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2024
* fix: reco-4: Refactor for gas optimizations (#83)

* Reco-3: add checks for parameters in function callTargets (#82)

Co-authored-by: ksatyarth2 <ksatyarth2@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: reco-1: remove unused state variables (#80)

* Reco-1: Add checks for constructor parameters (#81)

Co-authored-by: Benjamin <benjaminxh+github@gmail.com>

* fix: issue-1: precision issue in getPendingDistributionAmount (#78)

Co-authored-by: Benjamin <benjaminxh+github@gmail.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Kumar Satyarth <47723310+ksatyarth2@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: ksatyarth2 <ksatyarth2@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants