Implement: Missing Content Security Policy Configuration #30
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #26
The Content Security Policy (CSP) configuration was initially generated by Rails but left commented out, leaving the application without proper content security controls. The original configuration showed basic CSP directives but needed to be customized for this specific application's requirements.
The solution implements a comprehensive CSP that:
policy.default_src :self
) as a secure baselinepolicy.font_src :self, :https, :data
) to support web fontspolicy.img_src :self, :https, :data
) for avatar images and other visual contentpolicy.object_src :none
) to prevent plug-in based attackspolicy.script_src :self, :https
) while includingunsafe_inline
to support Tailwind CSS functionalitypolicy.style_src :self, :https, :unsafe_inline
) for Tailwind CSSpolicy.connect_src :self, "https://github.com"
) for OAuth authenticationpolicy.frame_ancestors :none
)policy.base_uri :self
) for securitypolicy.form_action :self, "https://github.com"
) for authenticationThe solution also implements nonce generation for better inline script/style security, using the session ID as a stable nonce source. This maintains security while allowing necessary functionality for Tailwind CSS and other inline requirements.
The configuration balances security with functionality, specifically accommodating:
While
unsafe_inline
is included for scripts and styles, this is a necessary trade-off for Tailwind CSS functionality. The risk is partially mitigated by strict controls on other directives and the use of nonces.Tip
You can make revisions or ask questions of Revise.dev by using
/revise
in any comment or review!/revise Add a comment above the method to explain why we're making this change.
/revise Why did you choose to make this change specifically?
Important
If something doesn’t look right, click to retry this interaction.
Quick links: View GitHub issue • View in Revise