Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feature/SPRIND-137 #174

Merged
merged 56 commits into from
Jan 23, 2025
Merged

feature/SPRIND-137 #174

merged 56 commits into from
Jan 23, 2025

Conversation

zoemaas
Copy link
Contributor

@zoemaas zoemaas commented Dec 6, 2024

No description provided.

@zoemaas zoemaas self-assigned this Dec 6, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 6, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 48.11%. Comparing base (642c60b) to head (44db119).
Report is 58 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #174   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    48.11%   48.11%           
========================================
  Files           75       75           
  Lines         5175     5175           
  Branches      1800     1800           
========================================
  Hits          2490     2490           
  Misses        2682     2682           
  Partials         3        3           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittest 48.11% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@zoemaas zoemaas marked this pull request as ready for review December 11, 2024 15:48
Copy link
Contributor

@sanderPostma sanderPostma left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No big things found

@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
"@sphereon/oid4vci-client": "workspace:*",
"@sphereon/oid4vci-common": "workspace:*",
"@sphereon/oid4vci-issuer": "workspace:*",
"@sphereon/ssi-types": "0.30.2-feature.mdoc.funke2.367",
"@sphereon/ssi-types": "0.32.1-feature.VDX.341.53",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This needs to be addressed. (For all instances of this branch)
Maybe it's best to create a separate PR for ssi-types, merged it, then use it in this repo, merge this one then SSI-SDK.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I will create a follow-up PR when SSI-SDK is merged. But first we need to merge this PR because SSI-SDK also depends on this project to a greater extend.

packages/siop-oid4vp/lib/op/OP.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -23,7 +23,8 @@
"node": ">=18"
},
"resolutions": {
"@sphereon/ssi-types": "0.30.2-feature.mdoc.funke2.367",
"@sphereon/ssi-types": "0.32.1-feature.VDX.341.53",

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

just wondering if we will keep working with packages with branch-names, after merge to developer we might fix it

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I will take care of it, see other tickets

throw new Error(SIOPErrors.REQUEST_CLAIMS_PRESENTATION_DEFINITION_NOT_VALID)

if (opts.vp_token.presentation_definition || opts.vp_token.presentation_definition_uri) {
const discoveryResult = PEX.definitionVersionDiscovery(opts.vp_token.presentation_definition)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll approve while waiting for @nklomp input here

@ronal2do
Copy link

approved

@ronal2do ronal2do self-requested a review January 23, 2025 09:06
@sanderPostma sanderPostma merged commit 49de36e into develop Jan 23, 2025
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants