Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

simplify util_sort.go FindTopNByScoreDesc #539

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Aug 23, 2024
Merged

Conversation

relyt29
Copy link
Contributor

@relyt29 relyt29 commented Aug 22, 2024

Purpose of Changes and their Description

As part of #421 I need to add features to util_sort for getting the top list of actors by score. I also observed some ways to make the FindTopNByScoreDesc function simpler as part of that effort. But due to the high level of importance of this code I wanted to do a refactor of this function in an isolated manner to make sure that no changes that affect tests / state are made by the way I rewrote the function. Hence this PR

Link(s) to Ticket(s) or Issue(s) resolved by this PR

Related to PROTO-2204

Are these changes tested and documented?

This code is a refactor and so it is tested by our existing unit tests to ensure that no logical changes have been made.

@relyt29 relyt29 self-assigned this Aug 22, 2024
@relyt29 relyt29 marked this pull request as ready for review August 23, 2024 00:04
@relyt29 relyt29 changed the title simplify util_sort.go simplify util_sort.go FindTopNByScoreDesc Aug 23, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@kpeluso kpeluso left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

clean!

Copy link
Contributor

@RedBird96 RedBird96 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@relyt29 relyt29 merged commit 9b8a9d8 into dev Aug 23, 2024
6 checks passed
@relyt29 relyt29 deleted the rewrite-FindTopNByScoreDesc branch August 23, 2024 10:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants