Update library prefix to beman_

[wusatosi]

In accordance to agreement in weekly sync:

Any beman.<short_name> Beman library name should be converted to beman_<short_name> for filling in the keys in YAML/configs inside the Compiler Explorer infrastructure. The display name from CE UI can be still set to beman.<short_name>, via libs.beman_.name = beman.<short_name>.

Packed a consistency fix LIBRARY.NAMES -> LIBRARY.NAME as it is inconsistent to REPOSITORY.NAME.

[neatudarius]

I think you had the missing context - We don't want to change Beman Standard. But same naming convention needs to additionally be applied when integration into CE (only in CE related PRs).

I will do that, be back with some guidelines. Please drop this PR, as we didn't decided to change the Beman Standard.

[neatudarius]

#70

[wusatosi]

Thanks for replying to this PR, noted.

So I assume the all the libraries should still be named as beman_shortname?

Edit: oh crap I mis-typed, I meant beman.shortname

[neatudarius]

Thanks for replying to this PR, noted.

So I assume the all the libraries should still be named as beman_shortname?

Not sure what you are asking. We should not change anything to Beman Standard because nobody voted / proposed this at the sync.

Beman Standard says:

So beman.optional26 it's everywhere in our org. No update from this PR should be kept. AFAIK.

I will clarify the CE naming in #70 .

[wusatosi]

Alright, I was reading the meeting note and misunderstood, closing this.

[neatudarius]

Examples can be found here: https://github.com/compiler-explorer/infra/pull/1453/files

beman_iterator_interface and beman.iterator_interface are both used in the compiler explorer config (as key in config and value in config). @wusatosi , does this clarify the issue?

[wusatosi]

Examples can be found here: https://github.com/compiler-explorer/infra/pull/1453/files

beman_iterator_interface and beman.iterator_interface are both used in the compiler explorer config (as key in config and value in config). @wusatosi , does this clarify the issue?

Alright, yeah I understand now.

According to: bemanproject/inplace_vector#14 (comment)

execution26 might be non-comforming.

[wusatosi]

Thanks for replying to this PR, noted.

So I assume the all the libraries should still be named as beman_shortname?

Edit: oh crap I mis-typed, I meant beman.shortname

I miss typed. Should be beman.shortname