[PM-16888] Refactor OrganizationUser status update procedure to use a GuidIdArray parameter and remove JSON parsing logic

[r-tome]

🎟️ Tracking

https://bitwarden.atlassian.net/browse/PM-16888

📔 Objective

When the stored procedure OrganizationUser_SetStatusForUsersById was initially created, it was designed to receive OrganizationUserIds as JSON due to advice at the time against using the GuidIdArray parameter type. Subsequently, to handle account revision updates, the User_BumpAccountRevisionDateByOrganizationUserIdsJson procedure was created.

After further discussion, it has been decided that using the GuidIdArray parameter type is acceptable. As a result, this task aims to:

Drop the stored procedure User_BumpAccountRevisionDateByOrganizationUserIdsJson.

Refactor OrganizationUser_SetStatusForUsersById to accept OrganizationUserIds as a GuidIdArray parameter instead of JSON.

⏰ Reminders before review

• Contributor guidelines followed
• All formatters and local linters executed and passed
• Written new unit and / or integration tests where applicable
• Protected functional changes with optionality (feature flags)
• Used internationalization (i18n) for all UI strings
• CI builds passed
• Communicated to DevOps any deployment requirements
• Updated any necessary documentation (Confluence, contributing docs) or informed the documentation team

🦮 Reviewer guidelines

• 👍 (:+1:) or similar for great changes
• 📝 (:memo:) or ℹ️ (:information_source:) for notes or general info
• ❓ (:question:) for questions
• 🤔 (:thinking:) or 💭 (:thought_balloon:) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed issue and could potentially benefit from discussion
• 🎨 (:art:) for suggestions / improvements
• ❌ (:x:) or ⚠️ (:warning:) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention
• 🌱 (:seedling:) or ♻️ (:recycle:) for future improvements or indications of technical debt
• ⛏ (:pick:) for minor or nitpick changes

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 47.65%. Comparing base (0153d9d) to head (f60f57d).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...Console/Repositories/OrganizationUserRepository.cs	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5237      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   44.52%   47.65%   +3.12%     
==========================================
  Files        1538     1538              
  Lines       70582    70582              
  Branches     6316     6316              
==========================================
+ Hits        31426    33633    +2207     
+ Misses      37810    35551    -2259     
- Partials     1346     1398      +52     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[github-actions]

Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Details – ac67035c-6708-44f5-b7aa-12cc1568ae04

Great job, no security vulnerabilities found in this Pull Request

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud