Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. Weโll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PM-18235] Add PersonalOwnershipPolicyRequirement #5439
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
[PM-18235] Add PersonalOwnershipPolicyRequirement #5439
Changes from 5 commits
9c3b720
595fbab
de9615e
26ddc8a
fd488c9
27876d6
4133e3e
43a2ba0
99e4e06
3debb5e
245f781
a9211f9
439a13a
24b644e
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
๐ฑ This constructor now has 10 dependencies. That's a good indication that this code is doing too much and a refactoring is in order.
โ What would you recommend changing if you could? Dream big!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Excellent observation! I think an easy thing to do would be to separate the individual vault import and the org vault import each into its own command. From there we could extract the validation logic into a validation class.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@djsmith85 โ๐ป
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Non-blocker: I know it's not part of your scope, but can we replace this comment with a meaningful variable name? I think your variable IsPersonalVaultRestricted is a good option.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe we should follow the should-when naming pattern for consistency?
Consider:
DisablePersonalOwnership_ShouldNotBeEnforced_WhenNoPersonalOwnershipPoliciesExist
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have renamed them to follow my usual pattern of
<MethodName>_<WithSomething>_<ExpectedResult>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider using this name or something similar:
DisablePersonalOwnership_ShouldNotBeEnforced_WhenUserIsAProvider
.