Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use new GitHub native aarch64 macOS runners #539

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 6, 2024
Merged

Conversation

pablogsal
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 30, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (41248ed) 92.55% compared to head (0b15e51) 92.50%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #539      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   92.55%   92.50%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files          91       91              
  Lines       11304    11304              
  Branches     1581     1581              
==========================================
- Hits        10462    10457       -5     
- Misses        837      842       +5     
  Partials        5        5              
Flag Coverage Δ
cpp 85.80% <ø> (-0.14%) ⬇️
python_and_cython 95.72% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@pablogsal pablogsal force-pushed the new_aarch64_macos branch 2 times, most recently from 931b3c3 to 48c1811 Compare January 31, 2024 14:33
@pablogsal pablogsal requested a review from godlygeek January 31, 2024 14:35
@pablogsal pablogsal enabled auto-merge (rebase) February 2, 2024 11:03
@pablogsal pablogsal force-pushed the new_aarch64_macos branch 2 times, most recently from ed5e8f1 to e8a50f6 Compare February 2, 2024 17:15
Now that GitHub has native arm64 macOS runners we can leverage these to
build and test our arm64 macOS wheels directly instead of relying on
cross-target compilation, which prevented us from exercising the wheels
in the CI.

Signed-off-by: Pablo Galindo <pablogsal@gmail.com>
@pablogsal
Copy link
Member Author

I tested the arm macOS wheels in older macOS versions (Ventura) thanks to @ambv:

3.11:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- snapshot report summary --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
19 snapshots passed.
============================================================================================== 586 passed, 15 skipped in 72.49s (0:01:12) ===============================================================================================

and 3.12:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- snapshot report summary --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
19 snapshots passed.
============================================================================================== 588 passed, 13 skipped in 89.35s (0:01:29) ===============================================================================================

@pablogsal
Copy link
Member Author

pablogsal commented Feb 6, 2024

@godlygeek I think we can be confident that this won't explode in older versions so I think we can proceed with this (you need to approve the PR for it to land)

Copy link
Contributor

@godlygeek godlygeek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@pablogsal pablogsal merged commit dcf747d into main Feb 6, 2024
27 checks passed
@pablogsal pablogsal deleted the new_aarch64_macos branch February 6, 2024 16:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants