Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add a page to expose non-deterministic errors details #185
add a page to expose non-deterministic errors details #185
Changes from 2 commits
267d8e6
279a14c
4cf00ef
38a71b1
35738e0
084833b
ca797dc
4450fbf
1aa32dc
eece494
6fcd0e9
e55a3d2
619e18a
89201dc
3d869a3
3bc8509
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
for this and the diagram: tbh I think this might sound too close to "it runs on cadence's machines" instead of "running in your workers".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hmm. do we call it that literally anywhere else? it's also not really "ownership", it can move around randomly constantly and that's also normal and fine.
I'd be very cautious of making new terms in a doc like this, particularly when they are used in other workflow systems for sometimes very different purposes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
pretty sure this also occurs when e.g. changing an activity to a timer, not just when the same high-level type contains different values that we check. probably worth covering that too.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we should probably check this more closely, but it might be true. I think it's currently thrown for other scenarios though, including "it replayed blindly too far before validating, and did something irrational instead of detecting the non-determinism earlier"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
changing duration is fine, adding or removing is not.
(possible exception: I'm not sure if using a timer with duration 0 is the same as "no timer" or not...)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
though tbh I'm not quite sure what this is trying to teach. from above, everything involves decision tasks, because that's what creates everything....... and you can't change decision tasks themselves at all, so....
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"checked in" isn't particularly relevant and isn't mentioned anywhere else anyway.