Apply uncontroversial ruff format changes

[bdrung]

Black and ruff format disagree how to format some multi-line Python code, but ruff is more aggressive in unwrapping lines. So apply the uncontroversial ruff format changes:

ruff format
black -C .

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 66.66667% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 83.60%. Comparing base (e18ec92) to head (27cfe6b).
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
apport/hookutils.py	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #459   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   83.60%   83.60%           
=======================================
  Files         101      101           
  Lines       20451    20451           
  Branches     3219     3219           
=======================================
  Hits        17098    17098           
  Misses       2858     2858           
  Partials      495      495           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[bdrung]

IMO codecov/patch can be ignored here since it failed to detect all modified lines.

[schopin-pro]

NACK, we pick one set of rules enforced by ONE TOOL and we stick with it. If you want to add to those rules in your own commits go for it, but don't enforce it globally unless you have (full) automation to back it up.

[bdrung]

Then let's wait for ruff format and black to not disagree.