Support running conda-smithy lint
in feedstock directory
#2250
+168
−11
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Checklist
news
entrypython conda_smithy/schema.py
)Fixes #2225
Extend the default behavior of
conda-smithy lint
to detect if a feedstock directory has been passed in place of the recipe directory (e.g. by running it with no paths specified), and handle the paths appropriately.The new logic covers three possible scenarios:
If
--feedstock-directory
is passed, everything works as before.If not, the specified directory is checked for
meta.yaml
andrecipe.yaml
, also as before.If neither exists, the specified directory is checked for
conda-forge.yml
. If it exists, it set to be the feedstock directory, and the file is parsed to determine the correct recipe subdirectory.This is primarily meant to address my common mistake of running:
in the feedstock directory, which can lead to pretty confusing error messages, particularly if the feedstock is using v1 recipes, and smithy says it can't find
recipe/meta.yaml
-- and you start wondering whether you've made a typo inconda-forge.yml
or what.This is an alternative to #2249.