Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency stylelint to v16.15.0 #331

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 5, 2025

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Mar 5, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
stylelint (source) 16.14.1 -> 16.15.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

stylelint/stylelint (stylelint)

v16.15.0

Compare Source

It adds 1 new rule, a languageOptions configuration property for configuring some of the new rules added in 16.13.0, regex support to 1 option and support for computing EditInfo to 6 rules. It fixes 9 bugs, including 2 with the tap reporter.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - "after 10am every weekday,before 4pm every weekday" in timezone Europe/London.

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot added the dependencies label Mar 5, 2025
@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge March 5, 2025 17:28
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/stylelint-16.x-lockfile branch from 010b52e to dad215c Compare March 5, 2025 21:02
@renovate renovate bot merged commit 25de3d9 into main Mar 5, 2025
4 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/stylelint-16.x-lockfile branch March 5, 2025 21:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants