Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CI] Serverless beats tests migration to beats #7184

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pazone
Copy link
Contributor

@pazone pazone commented Mar 4, 2025

What does this PR do?

Moves Serverless Beats tests buildkite step to a separate pipeline.

Note: This PR is tightly coupled with elastic/beats#43007. This PR should be merged first.

The Beats workflow will be capable of triggering Serverless beats tests when we push changes to the main/release branch. Build example - it is tested with a custom branch that triggers the tests in elastic-agent repo.

The Serverless Beats tests have to be completely migrated to the beats repo, but it uses the elastic-agent testing framework. A follow-up issue will be created

Why is it important?

The Serverless beats tests are related to the beats repo and have to be triggered by its events. Furthermore, it affects elastic-agent productivity by the long duration and the concurrency limitations.

Checklist

  • I have read and understood the pull request guidelines of this project.
  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have made corresponding change to the default configuration files
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have added an entry in ./changelog/fragments using the changelog tool
  • I have added an integration test or an E2E test

Disruptive User Impact

How to test this PR locally

Related issues

Questions to ask yourself

  • How are we going to support this in production?
  • How are we going to measure its adoption?
  • How are we going to debug this?
  • What are the metrics I should take care of?
  • ...

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Mar 4, 2025

This pull request does not have a backport label. Could you fix it @pazone? 🙏
To fixup this pull request, you need to add the backport labels for the needed
branches, such as:

  • backport-./d./d is the label that automatically backports to the 8./d branch. /d is the digit
  • backport-active-all is the label that automatically backports to all active branches.
  • backport-active-8 is the label that automatically backports to all active minor branches for the 8 major.
  • backport-active-9 is the label that automatically backports to all active minor branches for the 9 major.

@mergify mergify bot assigned pazone Mar 4, 2025
Copy link

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

@pazone pazone marked this pull request as ready for review March 4, 2025 20:36
@pazone pazone requested a review from a team as a code owner March 4, 2025 20:36
@pazone pazone requested review from pkoutsovasilis and cmacknz March 4, 2025 20:36
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

💛 Build succeeded, but was flaky

Failed CI Steps

cc @pazone

@pazone pazone added the Team:Elastic-Agent-Control-Plane Label for the Agent Control Plane team label Mar 4, 2025
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/elastic-agent-control-plane (Team:Elastic-Agent-Control-Plane)

@pazone pazone added the backport-active-all Automated backport with mergify to all the active branches label Mar 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport-active-all Automated backport with mergify to all the active branches skip-changelog Team:Elastic-Agent-Control-Plane Label for the Agent Control Plane team Team:Ingest-EngProd
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants