Add license

[RichardLitt]

This PR adds a license block to ethereum.rb, and adds an MIT license to the
repo in general.

Fixes #145.

[RichardLitt]

Whoa! That was totally unintentional! Do not merge until I resolve that. Sorry! Thanks @axic for pointing that out.

…

On Thursday, August 30, 2018, Alex Beregszaszi ***@***.***> wrote: ***@***.**** commented on this pull request. ------------------------------ In LICENSE.md <#183 (comment)> : > @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +MIT License + +Copyright (c) 2018 Richard Littauer I'm not sure this is the best approach, since you are not one of the main contributors according to the github insights page. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#183 (review)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA3loa0ZUK472V0JmBecj1LR36GMUsmgks5uV-ThgaJpZM4WIIaX> .

-- Richard | @richlitt <https://twitter.com/richlitt> | burntfen.com <http://www.burntfen.com>

[RichardLitt]

@axic Fixed!

[axic]

Contributors to the current files:

• README.md: @caktux @axic @hubgit @bryant1410 @maxme
• cpp-ethereum.rb: @caktux @bobsummerwill @debris @axic @EtherTyper @Pr0Ger @chfast
• ethereum.rb: @caktux @karalabe @fjl @bobsummerwill @Red54
• solidity.rb: @chriseth @axic @zhangsoledad @ulope @hayesgm @area @bobsummerwill

Or a better list here: https://github.com/ethereum/homebrew-ethereum/graphs/contributors

Anybody disagrees with this change? Please leave an acknowledgement.

[chriseth]

I agree with licensing this under MIT.

[bobsummerwill]

Apache 2.0 would be better than MIT, but if nobody has any appetite for switching direction from MIT to Apache 2.0 here than I am happy to go along with MIT.

[hayesgm]

I'm fine with MIT, Apache 2.0, or any other FOSS license discussed here.

[karalabe]

Fine by me.

…

On Thu, Sep 20, 2018, 02:46 Geoff Hayes ***@***.***> wrote: I'm fine with MIT, Apache 2.0, or any other FOSS license discussed here. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#183 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAH6GXJv-wS2Fmdi9aWtRJQVYEigrOBkks5uctc4gaJpZM4WIIaX> .

[axic]

In order of number of commits: @caktux @fjl @debris @zhangsoledad
Tthe following users only had one commit each: @bryant1410 @EtherTyper @Pr0Ger @chfast @ulope @area @Red54 @maxme

Can you all please respond with a Yes? :)

[Red54]

It's okay for me.

[chfast]

Yes.

[Pr0Ger]

Yes

[zhangsoledad]

Yes, please.

[area]

Yes

[EtherTyper]

Yes. 😄

[axic]

Pinging @caktux @debris @fjl @bryant1410 @maxme @ulope again.

[maxme]

Yes. 👍

[debris]

I agree with licensing this under MIT.

[fjl]

I don't understand why a Homebrew formula needs a license comment.

[fjl]

Also, yes

[axic]

Ping @caktux @ulope @bryant1410

[bobsummerwill]

Good luck with @caktux.
He didn't reply to contact requests even in late 2015!