Skip to content

Issues: fonttools/fontbakery

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

447 Open 2,214 Closed
447 Open 2,214 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

[check_cjk_vertical_metrics] Update CJK vertical metrics requirements Check improvement proposal
#5002 opened Feb 28, 2025 by aaronbell
1
[googlefonts/vertical_metrics] Some checks are redundant Check improvement proposal
#5001 opened Feb 27, 2025 by simoncozens
Add support for running fontspector checks Tool improvement Desirable but not crucial for the tool
#5000 opened Feb 27, 2025 by felipesanches
[opentype/STAT/ital_axis] Is reporting a FAIL on static fonts Check improvement proposal
#4998 opened Feb 25, 2025 by guidoferreyra
[googlefonts/metadata/valid_filename_values] appears redundant Check improvement proposal
#4997 opened Feb 20, 2025 by simoncozens
1
[opentype/name/match_familyname_fullfont] Unclear rationale, unsure whether fail is warranted Check improvement proposal
#4995 opened Feb 13, 2025 by arrowtype
[soft-dotted] GF-specific portion was recently removed, but would be good to add to a new check on googlefonts profile Check improvement proposal
#4993 opened Feb 11, 2025 by felipesanches
[unwanted_tables] Should not check for DSIG table Check improvement proposal
#4990 opened Feb 11, 2025 by khaledhosny 0.13.3
@felipesanches
1
cannot import name 'Checker' from 'shaperglot' [googlefonts.glyphsets.shape_languages]
#4987 opened Feb 6, 2025 by arrowtype
9
[googlefonts/STAT/compulsory_axis_values] does not run Check improvement proposal
#4982 opened Jan 29, 2025 by simoncozens
[name/italic_names] on Universal profile seems to be Google Fonts specific
#4971 opened Jan 16, 2025 by felipesanches
Fontbakery install blocked by latest cmarkgfm
#4957 opened Jan 6, 2025 by justinpenner
1
[colorfont_tables] Fails for any variable font with SVG table Check improvement proposal
#4946 opened Dec 28, 2024 by khaledhosny
1
Can we merge typenetwork/family/tnum_horizontal_metrics and googlefonts/family/tnum_horizontal_metrics ?
#4928 opened Dec 23, 2024 by felipesanches
[missing_small_caps_glyphs] is Just Wrong Check improvement proposal
#4919 opened Dec 2, 2024 by simoncozens
1
Some checks result in an ERROR if Graphite tables are present in the font
#4914 opened Nov 25, 2024 by devosb
1
[italic_angle] Doesn't actually check that post.italicAngle is as calculated Check improvement proposal
#4908 opened Nov 18, 2024 by simoncozens
@felipesanches
namecheck.fontdata.com site is down creating error
#4905 opened Nov 14, 2024 by mitradranirban
3
Read the Docs 'stable' link is 404'ing
#4891 opened Nov 11, 2024 by Hoolean
[vertical-metrics-not-centered] Only for new fonts Check improvement proposal
#4877 opened Oct 31, 2024 by emmamarichal
[com.google.fonts/check/STAT/gf_axisregistry] marks "Slant" Value anything other than Default as "Fail" Check improvement proposal
#4876 opened Oct 31, 2024 by mitradranirban
New check: napostrophe - suggest that we check for the presence of this glyph which is depreciated and warn to remove it. New check proposal We expect new check proposals to include a detailed rationale description and a suggested check-id
#4861 opened Oct 11, 2024 by EbenSorkin
3 of 7 tasks
4
[googlefonts/article/images] Bad HTML/Markdown rendering of bullet lists Check improvement proposal
#4855 opened Oct 10, 2024 by felipesanches
New check: intersecting and/or duplicate contours New check proposal We expect new check proposals to include a detailed rationale description and a suggested check-id
#4854 opened Oct 9, 2024 by rimas-kudelis
3
[empty_letters] failing with error "TypeError: object of type 'NoneType' has no len()" Check improvement proposal
#4850 opened Oct 4, 2024 by arrowtype
@felipesanches
3
ProTip! Add no:assignee to see everything that’s not assigned.