Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: read timeout errors in the logs moved to debug #220

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 18, 2024
Merged

Conversation

geertmeersman
Copy link
Owner

@geertmeersman geertmeersman commented Oct 18, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling for HTTP request timeouts, providing clearer context in error messages.
  • New Features

    • Enhanced logging for better visibility into error occurrences during HTTP requests.
  • Refactor

    • Updated method signature for is_sleeping to return a boolean value instead of an integer.
  • Style

    • Minor indentation fixes for consistent formatting in the code.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 18, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The changes made to the RobonectClient class in the custom_components/robonect/client/client.py file focus on improving error handling and logging within the async_cmd method. The logging level for read timeout errors has been adjusted, and the exception raised for no response has been modified to provide more context. Additionally, minor indentation fixes were applied for consistency. The method signature for is_sleeping was also updated to reflect a change in the return type from int to bool.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
custom_components/robonect/client/client.py - Changed logging level for httpx.ReadTimeout from _LOGGER.error to _LOGGER.debug.
- Modified exception handling to raise a new Exception with last_exception context.
- Fixed indentation for continue statements.
- Updated method signature of is_sleeping from def is_sleeping(self) -> int to def is_sleeping(self) -> bool.

Possibly related PRs

Poem

In the code where rabbits hop,
Logging changes, never stop!
Errors caught with clearer sight,
Indentations fixed, all feels right.
A new return, a boolean cheer,
Hopping forward, we persevere! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added fix A bug fix patch A change requiring a patch version bump labels Oct 18, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
custom_components/robonect/client/client.py (1)

is_sleeping method still returns int instead of bool.

  • The is_sleeping method in custom_components/robonect/client/client.py is currently defined with a return type of int:

    def is_sleeping(self) -> int:
        """Return if the mower is sleeping."""
        return self.is_sleeping

    This does not align with the expected bool return type.

🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 268-270: Verify implementation of is_sleeping method.

The return type annotation for the is_sleeping method has been correctly updated from int to bool, which better reflects the binary nature of the sleeping state.

Please ensure that the method implementation returns a boolean value to match this type annotation. Run the following script to verify the implementation:


Please run the following script to locate all definitions of the is_sleeping method and verify their signatures:


Please run the following script to locate all definitions of the is_sleeping method and verify their signatures:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of the is_sleeping method

# Test: Check if the is_sleeping method returns a boolean
ast-grep --lang python --pattern 'def is_sleeping(self) -> bool:
  $$$
  return $_'

Length of output: 85


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Locate all definitions of the is_sleeping method regardless of return type

ast-grep --lang python --pattern 'def is_sleeping(self) {
  $$$
  return $_
}'

Length of output: 425


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Locate all definitions of the is_sleeping method using ripgrep

# Search for the definition of is_sleeping in Python files
rg 'def is_sleeping' --type py -A 3

Length of output: 327

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f73c53e and fa0d30f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • custom_components/robonect/client/client.py (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
custom_components/robonect/client/client.py (2)

155-157: Verify the intent behind changing the log level for read timeouts.

The log level for read timeout errors has been changed from error to debug. While this reduces log noise for transient network issues, it might make it harder to detect persistent connection problems in production environments.

Consider the following suggestions:

  1. Add a comment explaining the rationale behind this change.
  2. Implement a mechanism to escalate to error level if multiple timeouts occur within a short period.

Please confirm if this change aligns with your error handling strategy.


168-170: Improved error reporting for failed requests.

The modification to include the string representation of the last exception in the raised Exception provides more context about the failure. This change will be beneficial for debugging connection issues.

Consider wrapping the string representation of last_exception in backticks for better formatting in log outputs:

raise Exception(
    f"Failed to get a response from the mower. `{str(last_exception)}`"
)

@geertmeersman geertmeersman merged commit 83a5c74 into main Oct 18, 2024
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
fix A bug fix patch A change requiring a patch version bump
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant