respect order_start/order_end in extraction #35
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I think this is something that I started at some point but never finished. It lets you specify start/end order number to extract spectra. This was meant to solve issues like #29.
With this change, one can set the optional order-range parameter in the command line like below
Or, add the following lines to the "recipe.conf" so that that option is applied by default, for example,
"""
[EXTRACTION]
ORDER_START_H=100
ORDER_END_H=122
ORDER_START_K=73
ORDER_END_K=93
"""
For now, it simply drops the "WAT" header. I think this is rarely used (the exception is IRAF I guess?) so should be okay.