Drop OpenShiftShort attribute

[leifmadsen]

The documentation style indicates we shouldn't be using OCP or OKD short
forms of OpenShift, so I'm dropping that.

[leifmadsen]

So here is a proposal for dropping OpenShiftShort.

Alternatively, could we maybe set the value to OpenShift instead of OCP or something? Right now we always use the long form, which downstream, is really quite long with Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform. I wonder if we should just use OpenShift as the short form?

[mickogeary]

How about setting the value to RHOCP?

[leifmadsen]

How about setting the value to RHOCP?

I think that defeats the purpose. My understanding is we're not supposed to abbreviate OpenShift at all.

[mickogeary]

Ok I'll double check with writing team. I can do another commit to #531 that includes the update from this PR (532) if that suits

[leifmadsen]

Ok I'll double check with writing team. I can do another commit to #531 that includes the update from this PR (532) if that suits

We only used OpenShiftShort in 2 spots previously, so I would drop all use of it to maintain consistency in the guide. Since we never used it before, I would recommend it be removed everywhere, and not added in the new disconnected contents.

[mickogeary]

These changes are incorporated into #531

[mickogeary]

Do doc-Service-Telemetry-Framework/modules/proc_overriding-a-managed-manifest.adoc and doc-Service-Telemetry-Framework/modules/proc_overriding-a-managed-manifest.adoc get published in the STF guide?

[leifmadsen]

Do doc-Service-Telemetry-Framework/modules/proc_overriding-a-managed-manifest.adoc and doc-Service-Telemetry-Framework/modules/proc_overriding-a-managed-manifest.adoc get published in the STF guide?

Doesn't seem so. I have opened #533 to drop the one file that still exists. Doesn't get included anywhere.