Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

move !rb to ruby-lang.org #195

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 18, 2025

Conversation

LevitatingBusinessMan
Copy link
Contributor

https://rubydocs.org has been brought offline. I now pointed !rb to !ruby which searches ruby-lang.org

I also updated !ruby to have a correct alternate domain set

@nobodywasishere
Copy link
Member

Thoughts on pointing these to https://rubydoc.info/stdlib/core/%s instead?

@LevitatingBusinessMan LevitatingBusinessMan force-pushed the ruby branch 2 times, most recently from 74c3a9a to 848e5f5 Compare March 18, 2025 17:14
@LevitatingBusinessMan
Copy link
Contributor Author

LevitatingBusinessMan commented Mar 18, 2025

Thoughts on pointing these to https://rubydoc.info/stdlib/core/%s instead?

I think that's what !rdoc is supposed to do, but that one is broken.

Anyway the two are inherently different. https://docs.ruby-lang.org/ offers official documentation for the official libraries.

https://rubydoc.info scrapes the rubygems and attempts to compile their documentation using yard.

I think !rb should point to the properly versioned and formatted official documentation. !rdoc should probably just be fixed

And although rubydoc.info technically can provide documentation for the official libraries the UI is awful.

Edit: also it should be noted that rubdydoc.info is down half of the day

LevitatingBusinessMan and others added 3 commits March 18, 2025 15:36
https://rubydocs.org has been brought offline. I now pointed !rb to !ruby which searches ruby-lang.org

I also updated !ruby to have a correct alternate domain set
it should point to rubydoc.info
@nobodywasishere nobodywasishere merged commit 4b72119 into kagisearch:main Mar 18, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants