Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Detect template changes for IDevID - docs and template mappings #1504

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 15, 2024

Conversation

Isaac-Matthews
Copy link
Contributor

These are documentation and template mapping changes that correspond to the changes in rust-keylime PR 689. The rust PR adds the auto-detect for IDevID and IAK templates and changes the default value for idevid templates in the agent.conf.

Leaving this on draft until the rust-agent pr is looked at/approved, as that is a prerequisite.

Signed-off-by: Isaac Matthews <isaac.matthews@hpe.com>
Signed-off-by: Isaac Matthews <isaac.matthews@hpe.com>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 4, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #1504 (3dcee66) into master (f2acbd2) will decrease coverage by 0.03%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files
Flag Coverage Δ
packit-e2e 72.48% <ø> (-0.03%) ⬇️
testsuite 30.73% <ø> (ø)
unittests 7.45% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

@Isaac-Matthews Isaac-Matthews marked this pull request as ready for review January 3, 2024 11:41
@maugustosilva
Copy link
Contributor

Just waiting for keylime/rust-keylime#689 to be merged.

@Isaac-Matthews
Copy link
Contributor Author

@maugustosilva 689 now merged so this can be merged now if you are happy with it. Thanks.

@maugustosilva maugustosilva merged commit ef0200a into keylime:master Jan 15, 2024
@THS-on THS-on added the docs label Feb 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants