Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Introduce default_config top-level function #242

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 7, 2024

Conversation

tnull
Copy link
Collaborator

@tnull tnull commented Feb 5, 2024

.. this allows us the retrieve a Config prepopulated with default values in bindings (where Default::default() isn't available), even if it includes complex structures for which we can't set default values in the UDL file.

.. this allows us the retrieve a `Config` prepopulated with default values in
bindings (where `Default::default()` isn't available), even if it
includes complex structures for which we can't set default values in the
UDL file.
@tnull tnull requested a review from G8XSU February 5, 2024 11:47
///
/// This is mostly meant for use in bindings, in Rust this is synonymous with
/// [`Config::default()`].
pub fn default_config() -> Config {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should this be "uniffi" flagged?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, good question. I debated that in my head to for a bit, I currently left it exposed in Rust too as the Rust docs are the only discoverable docs we have currently. It might be confusing if we'd only expose this in bindings.

I have no super strong opinion on this though.

@tnull tnull merged commit 6fef493 into lightningdevkit:main Feb 7, 2024
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants