Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(NODE-6632): destroy async resources when client closes #4388

Draft
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: test-santize-ee
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

nbbeeken
Copy link
Contributor

Description

What is changing?

Is there new documentation needed for these changes?

What is the motivation for this change?

Release Highlight

Fill in title or leave empty for no highlight

Double check the following

  • Ran npm run check:lint script
  • Self-review completed using the steps outlined here
  • PR title follows the correct format: type(NODE-xxxx)[!]: description
    • Example: feat(NODE-1234)!: rewriting everything in coffeescript
  • Changes are covered by tests
  • New TODOs have a related JIRA ticket

@nbbeeken nbbeeken changed the base branch from main to test-santize-ee January 30, 2025 16:19
@nbbeeken nbbeeken force-pushed the NODE-6632-close-signal branch from 6e10c5a to 60181b8 Compare January 30, 2025 16:26
@nbbeeken nbbeeken force-pushed the NODE-6632-close-signal branch from 60181b8 to 8c25ea2 Compare January 30, 2025 17:07
@nbbeeken nbbeeken force-pushed the NODE-6632-close-signal branch from 8c25ea2 to 4c6478e Compare January 30, 2025 17:30
@nbbeeken nbbeeken force-pushed the NODE-6632-close-signal branch from 4c6478e to 9620002 Compare January 30, 2025 17:49
@nbbeeken nbbeeken force-pushed the NODE-6632-close-signal branch 6 times, most recently from e3341b0 to af11878 Compare January 30, 2025 22:29
@nbbeeken nbbeeken force-pushed the NODE-6632-close-signal branch from af11878 to fe50fe1 Compare January 31, 2025 17:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant