-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 358
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Take holds into account for balance-consistency smoke test #2621
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Éloïs <c@elo.tf>
LGTM, but I don't master the style of this part of the code, so we'd need an additional review from someone who knows better, maybe @timbrinded or @Agusrodri ? |
Coverage Report@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master elfedy-fix-smoke-bc +/- ##
======================================================
Coverage 80.94% 80.94% 0.00%
Files 287 287
Lines 94330 94330
======================================================
- Hits 76355 76354 -1
+ Misses 17975 17976 +1
|
@elfedy can you please apply the new logic only if |
Co-authored-by: Agustín Rodriguez <agus@moonsonglabs.com>
@librelois done |
This test case is a nightmare (for perf reasons) but this change looks good to me. |
What does it do?
S300C100
Smoke test fails with runtime 2700 due to some reserve amount being added tohold
, so test needs to be adapted to that change by looking atholds
and adding them to the expected reserves.