fix(lint): fixing linter issues #102
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request encompass the introduction and modification of configuration files and code structure across various components of a FastAPI application. Key updates include the addition of a Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (21)
examples/fastapi-mongo-with-docker-compose/app/router/routes.py (1)
10-13: Approve the addition of the healthcheck endpoint with a minor suggestion.The new healthcheck endpoint is a valuable addition to the API. It follows FastAPI best practices and provides a simple way to check the service status.
For consistency with the root endpoint, consider adding a newline before the function definition.
Here's a suggested minor change for consistency:
@router.get("/healthz") + async def healthcheck() -> dict[str, str]: return {"status": "ok"}examples/fastapi-mongo-with-docker-compose/routes.py (1)
10-13: LGTM! Well-implemented health check endpoint.The new healthcheck endpoint is correctly implemented and follows best practices:
- Uses the conventional "/healthz" path
- Properly defined as an async function
- Correct return type annotation
- Simple and clear response structure
For future enhancements, consider expanding the health check to include more detailed information about the service's health, such as database connectivity or dependency statuses.
examples/fastapi-simple-docker-pip/app/schemas/note.py (2)
18-20: LGTM! Consider adding a docstring for clarity.The
NoteUpdateclass is well-structured and serves its purpose of extendingNoteBasewith anidfield for note updates.Consider adding a brief docstring to explain the class's purpose:
class NoteUpdate(NoteBase): """Pydantic model for updating an existing note.""" id: str
22-25: LGTM! Consider adding a docstring for clarity.The
NoteOutclass is well-structured and correctly configured for ORM object serialization.Consider adding a brief docstring to explain the class's purpose:
class NoteOut(NoteBase): """Pydantic model for serializing notes in API responses.""" class Config: from_attributes = Trueexamples/fastapi-simple-docker-pip/app/config.py (1)
Line range hint
12-19: LGTM: Well-structured email settings. Consider adding validations.The
EmailSettingsclass is well-organized and follows Pydantic conventions. The use ofFieldwith aliases for environment variables and optional fields withNonedefaults provides flexibility.Consider adding validations for:
- Email format for
from_emailandto_email.- Port range for
smtp_port(typically 0-65535).Example implementation:
from pydantic import EmailStr, Field, PositiveInt class EmailSettings(BaseSettings): model_config = SettingsConfigDict(extra="ignore") smtp_host: str | None = Field(alias="EMAIL_SMTP_HOST", default=None) smtp_port: PositiveInt | None = Field(alias="EMAIL_SMTP_PORT", default=None, lt=65536) smtp_user: str | None = Field(alias="EMAIL_SMTP_USER", default=None) smtp_password: str | None = Field(alias="EMAIL_SMTP_PASSWORD", default=None) from_email: EmailStr | None = Field(alias="EMAIL_FROM_EMAIL", default=None) to_email: EmailStr | None = Field(alias="EMAIL_TO_EMAIL", default=None)This ensures that the port is within the valid range and email addresses are properly formatted.
examples/fastapi-crud/src/exceptions/database_exceptions.py (1)
29-29: LGTM with a minor suggestion: Consider adjusting indentationThe condensed
raise HTTPExceptionstatement improves consistency and readability. However, consider adjusting the indentation of thefrom integrity_errorclause to align with PEP 8 guidelines.Here's a suggested improvement:
- status_code=status.HTTP_409_CONFLICT, detail=detail - ) from integrity_error + status_code=status.HTTP_409_CONFLICT, detail=detail + ) from integrity_errorThis change ensures that the
fromclause is aligned with the opening parenthesis of theraisestatement, which is the recommended style in PEP 8.examples/fastapi-simple-docker-pip/app/auth/mock_auth_provider.py (1)
26-29: LGTM: Improved method signature formatting.The multi-line formatting of the
create_usermethod signature enhances readability and adheres to PEP 8 guidelines. This is a good improvement.Consider adding type hinting for the return value to be consistent with other methods:
def create_user( self, email: str, attributes: List[Dict[str, Any]], groups: List[str] ) -> Dict[str, Any]: return {"response": "User created successfully"}examples/fastapi-crud/src/services/company_service.py (2)
30-30: LGTM: Improved formatting inpatchmethod.The removal of unnecessary parentheses in the
forloop improves code readability and adheres to common Python style guidelines. This change aligns with the PR objective of addressing linter issues.Consider applying similar formatting improvements throughout the codebase for consistency.
Line range hint
1-47: Overall, the file looks good with minor improvements.The changes made in this file successfully address linter issues and improve code quality. The
CompanyServiceclass is well-structured with consistent use of type hinting and clear method implementations.For future improvements:
- Consider adding docstrings to methods that currently lack them (e.g.,
get_all,get_by_id,create,delete_company).- Evaluate if any methods could benefit from additional error handling or input validation.
- Assess if any of these methods could be candidates for unit testing, if not already covered.
These suggestions are not critical for this PR but could enhance the overall quality and maintainability of the codebase in future iterations.
examples/fastapi-crud/src/controllers/company_controllers.py (3)
26-26: LGTM: Consistent use of trailing commasThe addition of a trailing comma to the
response_modelparameter maintains consistency with the previous changes and adheres to good Python practices.Consider refactoring
DependsusageThe static analysis tool flagged the use of
Dependsin the argument default. Consider refactoring this to avoid potential issues:from fastapi import Depends def get_db_dependency(): return Depends(get_db) @router.get( "/", status_code=status.HTTP_200_OK, name="Get all companies", response_model=List[CompanySchema], ) async def get_all_companies(db: Session = get_db_dependency()): return await CompanyService.get_all(db)This approach moves the
Dependscall out of the argument default, addressing the static analysis concern while maintaining the same functionality.
33-33: LGTM with suggestion: Consider multi-line format for improved readabilityThe condensed decorator improves code compactness and is consistent with the file's style changes. However, for improved readability, especially with longer decorator lines, consider using a multi-line format:
@router.get( "/{id}", status_code=status.HTTP_200_OK, name="Get Company by Id", response_model=CompanySchema, )This format maintains consistency with other decorators in the file and enhances readability.
59-59: LGTM with suggestion: Consider multi-line format for improved readabilityThe condensed decorator improves code compactness and is consistent with the file's style changes. However, for improved readability and consistency with other decorators in the file, consider using a multi-line format:
@router.delete( "/{id}", status_code=status.HTTP_204_NO_CONTENT, name="Delete company by id", )This format enhances readability and maintains consistency with other decorators in the file.
examples/fastapi-crud/src/factories/employee_factory.py (1)
43-45: LGTM: Improved method signature formatting.The multi-line format for the
bulk_creator_for_companymethod signature enhances readability.Consider adding a trailing comma after the last parameter for consistency with other multi-line constructs:
async def bulk_creator_for_company( self, quantity: int, db: Session, company_id: str | None = None, ):examples/fastapi-crud/src/models/schemas/employee.py (1)
87-87: Great addition of strict schema validation!The inclusion of
extra = "forbid"in theConfigclass forPatchEmployeeSchemais consistent with the changes made toNewEmployeeSchemaand enhances input validation.Consider updating the docstring to be more specific:
class Config: """Validates the request by forbidding extra fields not defined in the schema. Raises a validation error if extra fields are present. https://pydantic-docs.helpmanual.io/usage/model_config/#options """ extra = "forbid"examples/cli-typer-base/services/calculator.py (2)
17-20: LGTM: Improved formatting of nested method calls andpowfunction.The reformatting of nested
.get()calls and thepowfunction improves code readability without altering functionality. This aligns well with the PR's goal of addressing linter issues and enhancing code style.Consider using parentheses instead of line continuation for multi-line expressions:
self.conversion_params.exchange = pow( self.conversion_params.exchange.get( self.conversion_params.to_currency ).get(OperationType.SELL.value), -1, ) self.conversion_params.exchange = ( self.conversion_params.exchange.get( self.conversion_params.from_currency ).get(OperationType.BUY.value) )This style is often considered more Pythonic and can improve readability further.
Also applies to: 23-25
62-62: LGTM: Improved formatting of converted value output.The use of string formatting to limit the converted value to two decimal places enhances the presentation of the output. This is a good improvement in line with the PR's objectives.
Consider using an f-string for better readability and performance:
str(f"{self.calculator.converted_value:.2f}")This approach is more Pythonic and potentially more efficient than the
%operator for string formatting.examples/fastapi-crud/src/services/employee_service.py (1)
51-53: LGTM: Loop syntax simplified.The removal of parentheses in the
forloop improves readability and adheres to more Pythonic style. This change is consistent with similar modifications in other files.For consistency with other parts of the codebase, consider using double quotes for string literals. Apply this minor change:
- for key, value in request.dict().items(): + for key, value in request.dict().items(): if value is not None: - setattr(employee, key, value) + setattr(employee, key, value)examples/fastapi-simple-docker-pip/app/auth/auth.py (2)
20-24: LGTM: Function signature improved.The changes to the
get_access_tokenfunction signature enhance readability and type accuracy. The trailing comma is a good practice for multi-line parameter lists, and the updated return type correctly includes theHTTPExceptionpossibility.Consider using
Union[Dict[str, Any], HTTPException]instead ofDict[str, any] | HTTPExceptionfor better compatibility with older Python versions if needed. Also, capitalizeAnyfor consistency with type hinting conventions.
Line range hint
1-70: Overall changes improve code quality and consistency.The modifications in this file primarily focus on enhancing code style and maintaining consistency, which aligns well with the PR objective of fixing linter issues. Key improvements include:
- Consistent use of double quotes for strings.
- Addition of trailing commas in multi-line constructs.
- More accurate type annotations.
- Reintroduction of previously removed imports.
These changes contribute to better code readability and maintainability without altering the core functionality of the authentication process.
Consider documenting the authentication flow and any new fields (like
is_premium) in the module or function docstrings to improve code understandability for new contributors.examples/fastapi-crud/src/repositories/company_repository.py (1)
Line range hint
45-46: Inconsistency in error handling in thecreatemethod.While the exception handling has been improved, there's an inconsistency in the
createmethod. Thethrow_internal_server_errorcall is missing the exception argumentein the generalExceptioncatch block.To maintain consistency, please update the line as follows:
- DatabaseExceptions.throw_internal_server_error() + DatabaseExceptions.throw_internal_server_error(e)This change will ensure that exception details are consistently passed in all error scenarios.
examples/fastapi-crud/src/repositories/employee_repository.py (1)
Line range hint
79-79: Fix incorrect comment inpatchmethod.The comment for the
patchmethod incorrectly states that it "Updates a company record in DB". This should be corrected to accurately reflect the method's purpose.Please update the comment as follows:
-"""Updates a company record in DB""" +"""Updates an employee record in DB"""
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Pipfile.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (57)
- .flake8 (1 hunks)
- .pre-commit-config.yaml (1 hunks)
- Pipfile (1 hunks)
- examples/cli-base/setup.py (1 hunks)
- examples/cli-base/src/app.py (1 hunks)
- examples/cli-typer-base/main.py (5 hunks)
- examples/cli-typer-base/services/calculator.py (2 hunks)
- examples/cli-typer-base/services/input_wrapper.py (2 hunks)
- examples/cli-typer-base/tables/exchange.py (2 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-base/src/controllers/users_controller.py (1 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-base/src/core/config.py (1 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-base/src/factories/user_factory.py (0 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-base/src/main.py (2 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-base/src/models/user_model.py (0 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-base/src/routes/routers.py (1 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-crud/src/alembic_migrations/env.py (4 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-crud/src/alembic_migrations/versions/11bd0063b0af_specified_not_nullable_fields_in_.py (1 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-crud/src/alembic_migrations/versions/15509efef468_first_revision.py (2 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-crud/src/alembic_migrations/versions/df8afbc693b9_add_company_model.py (1 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-crud/src/controllers/company_controllers.py (5 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-crud/src/controllers/employee_controllers.py (4 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-crud/src/core/config.py (1 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-crud/src/db/database.py (2 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-crud/src/exceptions/database_exceptions.py (2 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-crud/src/factories/companies_factory.py (2 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-crud/src/factories/employee_factory.py (2 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-crud/src/main.py (2 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-crud/src/models/models.py (3 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-crud/src/models/schemas/company.py (2 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-crud/src/models/schemas/employee.py (2 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-crud/src/repositories/company_repository.py (1 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-crud/src/repositories/employee_repository.py (1 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-crud/src/routes/routers.py (1 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-crud/src/services/company_service.py (2 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-crud/src/services/employee_service.py (2 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-gql/src/factories/company_factory.py (0 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-gql/src/main.py (1 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-gql/src/models/company_model.py (0 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-gql/src/models/queries.py (1 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-gql/src/models/types.py (1 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-mongo-with-docker-compose/app/main.py (1 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-mongo-with-docker-compose/app/router/routes.py (1 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-mongo-with-docker-compose/main.py (1 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-mongo-with-docker-compose/routes.py (1 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-postgres-with-serverless/src/main.py (0 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-simple-docker-pip/app/auth/auth.py (2 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-simple-docker-pip/app/auth/generic_auth_provider.py (2 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-simple-docker-pip/app/auth/mock_auth_provider.py (2 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-simple-docker-pip/app/config.py (1 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-simple-docker-pip/app/constants.py (0 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-simple-docker-pip/app/main.py (1 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-simple-docker-pip/app/repositories/note_repository.py (1 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-simple-docker-pip/app/router/note_routes.py (1 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-simple-docker-pip/app/schemas/note.py (1 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-simple-docker-pip/tests/integration/test_main_routes.py (1 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-simple-docker-pip/tests/unit/test_build.py (1 hunks)
- pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (6)
- examples/fastapi-base/src/factories/user_factory.py
- examples/fastapi-base/src/models/user_model.py
- examples/fastapi-gql/src/factories/company_factory.py
- examples/fastapi-gql/src/models/company_model.py
- examples/fastapi-postgres-with-serverless/src/main.py
- examples/fastapi-simple-docker-pip/app/constants.py
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (29)
- .flake8
- .pre-commit-config.yaml
- examples/cli-base/setup.py
- examples/cli-base/src/app.py
- examples/cli-typer-base/tables/exchange.py
- examples/fastapi-base/src/controllers/users_controller.py
- examples/fastapi-base/src/core/config.py
- examples/fastapi-base/src/main.py
- examples/fastapi-base/src/routes/routers.py
- examples/fastapi-crud/src/alembic_migrations/env.py
- examples/fastapi-crud/src/alembic_migrations/versions/15509efef468_first_revision.py
- examples/fastapi-crud/src/core/config.py
- examples/fastapi-crud/src/db/database.py
- examples/fastapi-crud/src/factories/companies_factory.py
- examples/fastapi-crud/src/main.py
- examples/fastapi-crud/src/models/models.py
- examples/fastapi-crud/src/routes/routers.py
- examples/fastapi-gql/src/main.py
- examples/fastapi-gql/src/models/queries.py
- examples/fastapi-gql/src/models/types.py
- examples/fastapi-mongo-with-docker-compose/app/main.py
- examples/fastapi-mongo-with-docker-compose/main.py
- examples/fastapi-simple-docker-pip/app/auth/generic_auth_provider.py
- examples/fastapi-simple-docker-pip/app/main.py
- examples/fastapi-simple-docker-pip/app/repositories/note_repository.py
- examples/fastapi-simple-docker-pip/app/router/note_routes.py
- examples/fastapi-simple-docker-pip/tests/integration/test_main_routes.py
- examples/fastapi-simple-docker-pip/tests/unit/test_build.py
- pyproject.toml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff
examples/fastapi-crud/src/controllers/company_controllers.py
28-28: Do not perform function call
Dependsin argument defaults; instead, perform the call within the function, or read the default from a module-level singleton variable(B008)
55-55: Do not perform function call
Dependsin argument defaults; instead, perform the call within the function, or read the default from a module-level singleton variable(B008)
examples/fastapi-crud/src/controllers/employee_controllers.py
20-20: Do not perform function call
Dependsin argument defaults; instead, perform the call within the function, or read the default from a module-level singleton variable(B008)
62-62: Do not perform function call
Dependsin argument defaults; instead, perform the call within the function, or read the default from a module-level singleton variable(B008)
🔇 Additional comments (64)
examples/fastapi-mongo-with-docker-compose/app/router/routes.py (1)
Line range hint
1-13: Summary: Successful addition of a healthcheck endpointThe changes in this file align well with the PR objectives. The new healthcheck endpoint ("/healthz") has been added successfully, following FastAPI best practices. This addition enhances the API's functionality by providing a simple way to check the service status, which is valuable for monitoring and load balancing purposes.
The existing code, including the root endpoint, remains unchanged and continues to follow best practices. The file structure is clean and consistent, with the minor suggestion for adding a newline before the new function definition for perfect consistency.
Overall, these changes contribute positively to the codebase by improving its maintainability and operational capabilities.
examples/fastapi-simple-docker-pip/app/schemas/note.py (1)
18-25: Overall, great additions to enhance note schema definitions.The new
NoteUpdateandNoteOutclasses provide clear separation of concerns for different note-related operations. These additions align well with the PR objectives of improving code quality and structure. The use of Pydantic models ensures type safety and easy integration with FastAPI.Pipfile (2)
1-4: LGTM: Source configuration is secure and standard.The [source] section is correctly configured to use PyPI with SSL verification enabled, which is a secure and standard practice.
21-22: Python 3.12 specified; verify library compatibility.The choice of Python 3.12 is forward-thinking as it's the latest stable version. This allows access to the newest language features and improvements.
However, it's important to ensure all required libraries are compatible with Python 3.12. Run the following script to check the Python version support of the specified packages:
This script will help verify that all packages support Python 3.12. If any incompatibilities are found, consider adjusting the Python version or finding alternative packages.
examples/fastapi-simple-docker-pip/app/config.py (3)
10-10: LGTM: Improved code structure.The addition of a blank line between class definitions enhances readability and adheres to PEP 8 guidelines.
Line range hint
22-23: LGTM: Email settings successfully integrated.The addition of the
Settingsclass properly integrates the newEmailSettings. This structure allows for easy access to email configuration throughout the application.
Line range hint
1-28: Summary: Linter issues addressed and configuration improved.The changes in this file successfully address linter issues and improve code quality, aligning with the PR objectives. The introduction of the
EmailSettingsclass and its integration into the mainSettingsclass enhances the configuration management of the application.To fully meet the PR objectives:
- Ensure that these changes are consistently applied across the codebase.
- Verify that the new email settings are properly documented.
- Consider adding tests for the new
EmailSettingsclass to ensure its functionality.To verify the consistency of these changes, run the following script:
This script will help identify any inconsistencies in the usage of the new email settings across the project.
✅ Verification successful
The changes in
examples/fastapi-simple-docker-pip/app/config.pyhave been successfully verified. No inconsistencies or issues were found related to the usage ofEmailSettingsacross the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent use of email settings across the codebase # Test 1: Check for usage of EmailSettings echo "Checking for usage of EmailSettings:" rg "EmailSettings" --type py # Test 2: Check for potential places where email configuration might be used echo "Checking for potential email configuration usage:" rg "smtp|email" --type py # Test 3: Check for updated import statements echo "Checking for updated import statements:" rg "from app.config import settings" --type pyLength of output: 8706
examples/fastapi-crud/src/exceptions/database_exceptions.py (3)
12-12: LGTM: Improved formatting for better readabilityThe reformatting of the
detailparameter to a single line improves code readability while maintaining the same functionality. This change aligns with the project's linting standards, particularly the 100-character line length limit.
18-18: LGTM: Consistent formatting appliedThe
raise HTTPExceptionstatement has been condensed to a single line, improving consistency with other methods in the class. This change maintains the same functionality while adhering to the project's formatting standards.
Line range hint
1-30: Overall assessment: Consistent improvements in code formattingThe changes in this file successfully address the PR's objective of fixing linter issues. The formatting improvements enhance readability and maintain consistency across the
DatabaseExceptionsclass methods. These modifications align well with the project's coding standards, particularly the 100-character line length limit mentioned in the.flake8configuration.No functional changes were made, ensuring that the existing error handling logic remains intact. The condensed
raise HTTPExceptionstatements improve code clarity without sacrificing functionality.Great job on improving the code quality and adhering to the project's standards!
examples/fastapi-simple-docker-pip/app/auth/mock_auth_provider.py (4)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement reordering.The reordering of imports from the
typingmodule is a minor change that improves code consistency and likely complies with linting rules.
13-13: LGTM: Added trailing comma in dictionary.The addition of a trailing comma in the returned dictionary is a good practice. It makes future additions easier and improves version control diffs.
23-23: LGTM: Consistent use of trailing comma.The addition of a trailing comma here maintains consistency with the earlier change in the
authenticate_usermethod. This improves overall code style consistency.
Line range hint
1-39: Overall assessment: Linting and style improvements.The changes in this file are consistent with the PR's objective of addressing linter issues. The modifications improve code readability and maintain a consistent style throughout the file. No functional changes were introduced, which minimizes the risk of new bugs.
To ensure no unintended functional changes were introduced, run the following command:
This command will show any non-whitespace, non-comma changes between the current version and the previous version of the file. If there's no output, it confirms that only formatting changes were made.
✅ Verification successful
Formatting Changes Verified
Only formatting changes were made.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that only formatting changes were made to the file. # Test: Check for any changes other than whitespace or commas rg -p --color never -e '[^,\s]' examples/fastapi-simple-docker-pip/app/auth/mock_auth_provider.py | diff -u <(git show HEAD:examples/fastapi-simple-docker-pip/app/auth/mock_auth_provider.py | rg -p --color never -e '[^,\s]') -Length of output: 284
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that only formatting changes were made to the file. # Create stripped version of the current file (remove whitespace and commas) tr -d ' \t\n,' < examples/fastapi-simple-docker-pip/app/auth/mock_auth_provider.py > new_version.stripped # Create stripped version of the previous version of the file git show HEAD:examples/fastapi-simple-docker-pip/app/auth/mock_auth_provider.py | tr -d ' \t\n,' > old_version.stripped # Compare the two stripped versions diff old_version.stripped new_version.stripped > diff_output.txt # Output the result if [ -s diff_output.txt ]; then echo "Non-formatting changes detected:" cat diff_output.txt else echo "Only formatting changes were made." fi # Clean up temporary files rm new_version.stripped old_version.stripped diff_output.txtLength of output: 335
examples/fastapi-crud/src/services/company_service.py (1)
8-8: LGTM: Import added for proper type hinting.The addition of
from sqlalchemy.orm import Sessionis correct and necessary. It ensures proper type hinting for thedbparameter in method signatures, improving code clarity and static type checking capabilities.This change aligns well with the PR objective of fixing linter issues and maintains consistency with similar changes in other files.
examples/fastapi-crud/src/models/schemas/company.py (3)
43-43: Excellent addition of strict input validation!The inclusion of
extra = "forbid"in the Config class is a great improvement. This setting enhances input validation by rejecting any unexpected fields in the request data, which can help prevent potential bugs and improve overall data integrity.
66-66: Consistent implementation of strict validation - Great job!The addition of
extra = "forbid"to PatchCompanySchema's Config class mirrors the change in NewCompanySchema. This consistency is excellent for maintaining a uniform approach to input validation across different schema classes.
Line range hint
1-66: Summary: Improved input validation for company schemasThe changes to this file consistently implement strict input validation for both NewCompanySchema and PatchCompanySchema. This enhancement aligns well with the PR's objective of addressing linter issues and improving code quality. The added Config classes with
extra = "forbid"will help catch potential errors early by rejecting unexpected fields in the input data.These modifications contribute to a more robust and maintainable codebase. Great work on implementing these improvements consistently across both schema classes!
examples/fastapi-crud/src/controllers/company_controllers.py (4)
4-4: LGTM: Import organization improvedThe reorganization of import statements enhances code readability by grouping related imports together, which aligns with PEP 8 guidelines for import organization.
Also applies to: 7-7
16-16: LGTM: Consistent use of trailing commasAdding a trailing comma to the
response_modelparameter improves code consistency and adheres to good Python practices. This change facilitates easier future modifications and results in cleaner diffs.
43-43: LGTM: Consistent use of trailing commasThe addition of a trailing comma to the
response_modelparameter maintains consistency with previous changes and adheres to good Python practices.
Line range hint
1-62: Overall assessment: Improved code style and consistencyThe changes in this file successfully address linter issues and improve code consistency. The modifications include:
- Better organization of import statements
- Consistent use of trailing commas in multi-line function decorators
- Condensed single-line decorators for compact code
These changes align well with the PR objectives and enhance the overall code quality. Consider the suggestions for multi-line decorators and refactoring
Dependsusage to further improve readability and address static analysis concerns.🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff
28-28: Do not perform function call
Dependsin argument defaults; instead, perform the call within the function, or read the default from a module-level singleton variable(B008)
35-35: Do not perform function call
Dependsin argument defaults; instead, perform the call within the function, or read the default from a module-level singleton variable(B008)
examples/fastapi-crud/src/factories/employee_factory.py (3)
8-8: LGTM: Import statement reorganization.Moving the
Sessionimport fromsqlalchemy.ormimproves code organization and consistency with other files in the project.
53-53: LGTM: Minor formatting improvement.Consolidating the parameters for
_employee_creatoronto a single line is a reasonable change that maintains readability while slightly reducing the method's line count.
Line range hint
1-53: Overall assessment: Formatting improvements align with linting objectives.The changes in this file successfully address formatting issues, improving code readability and consistency. These modifications align well with the PR's objective of fixing linter issues. No functional changes were introduced, maintaining the existing behavior of the
EmployeesFactoryclass.examples/fastapi-crud/src/models/schemas/employee.py (1)
62-62: Excellent addition of strict schema validation!The inclusion of
extra = "forbid"in theConfigclass enhances input validation by rejecting any extra fields not defined in the schema. This change aligns with best practices and helps prevent potential issues caused by unexpected input data.examples/fastapi-crud/src/controllers/employee_controllers.py (7)
4-4: LGTM: Import statements reordered.The reordering of import statements improves readability and follows common conventions for grouping imports.
Also applies to: 8-8
17-17: LGTM: Added trailing comma in decorator.The addition of a trailing comma in the route decorator is a good style choice. It makes future additions easier and improves version control diffs.
29-29: LGTM: Added trailing comma in decorator.The addition of a trailing comma in the route decorator is consistent with the previous changes and maintains a uniform style throughout the file.
50-50: LGTM: Consistent style improvements.The changes in these lines maintain consistency with the previous modifications:
- Added trailing commas to
response_modelparameters (lines 50, 60).- Consolidated the delete route decorator into a single line (line 66).
These changes improve readability and maintain a uniform style throughout the file without altering functionality.
Also applies to: 60-60, 66-66
Line range hint
1-68: Summary: Style improvements and minor refactoring.Overall, the changes in this file are positive:
- Import statements have been reordered for better organization.
- Trailing commas have been added consistently to improve maintainability.
- Some decorators have been consolidated for better readability.
These changes improve code quality without altering functionality. The Ruff static analysis hints about
Dependsusage in function signatures have been noted, but they refer to a common FastAPI pattern that doesn't cause practical issues. If you decide to address these, ensure consistency across the entire project.Great job on improving the code style and maintainability!
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff
20-20: Do not perform function call
Dependsin argument defaults; instead, perform the call within the function, or read the default from a module-level singleton variable(B008)
31-31: Do not perform function call
Dependsin argument defaults; instead, perform the call within the function, or read the default from a module-level singleton variable(B008)
62-62: Consider addressing the Ruff B008 hint consistently.The Ruff static analysis tool has flagged another instance of
Depends(get_db)in a function signature. As discussed earlier, while this is a common pattern in FastAPI, you might want to consider refactoring it for consistency if you choose to address these hints.If you decide to refactor, you could apply the same approach as suggested for the
mock_employee_creatorfunction:async def new_employee(request: NewCompanySchema, db: Session): return await EmployeeService.create(request, db) new_employee = Depends(new_employee)This refactoring would satisfy the linter while maintaining the same functionality. However, it's important to weigh the benefits of strict linter adherence against the common FastAPI patterns and team preferences.
To ensure consistent handling of this pattern throughout the project, you can run:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all instances of Depends in function signatures rg 'def.*Depends\(' -g '*.py'This will help you identify all similar instances and make an informed decision on whether to refactor them all or keep the current pattern.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff
62-62: Do not perform function call
Dependsin argument defaults; instead, perform the call within the function, or read the default from a module-level singleton variable(B008)
19-21: LGTM: Function signature updated with trailing comma.The addition of a trailing comma in the function signature is consistent with the style used in the decorator and improves maintainability.
Regarding the Ruff hint B008 for
Depends(get_db):
This is a common pattern in FastAPI and doesn't cause issues in practice. FastAPI's dependency injection system is designed to work this way. However, if you want to strictly adhere to the linter's suggestion, you could refactor it as follows:async def mock_employee_creator( quantity: int, db: Session, company_id: str = None ): ... mock_employee_creator = Depends(mock_employee_creator)This approach separates the function definition from the dependency injection, satisfying the linter while maintaining the same functionality.
To ensure this pattern is consistently used across the project, you can run:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Consistent usage of
Depends(get_db)confirmed.The
Depends(get_db)pattern is consistently used across multiple functions and aligns with FastAPI's best practices for dependency injection. No issues found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for similar Depends usage in function signatures rg 'def.*Depends\(' -g '*.py'Length of output: 1542
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff
20-20: Do not perform function call
Dependsin argument defaults; instead, perform the call within the function, or read the default from a module-level singleton variable(B008)
examples/cli-typer-base/services/calculator.py (3)
10-10: LGTM: Constructor signature reformatted for better readability.The constructor signature has been consolidated into a single line, which improves readability without changing functionality. This change is consistent with the PR's objective of addressing linter issues and improving code style.
46-46: LGTM: Improved formatting ofStyleparameters in table column definitions.The reformatting of
Styleparameters in the table column definitions enhances code readability. This change is in line with the PR's goal of addressing linter issues and improving overall code style.Also applies to: 53-53
Line range hint
1-62: Overall assessment: Successful code style improvements.The changes made to this file successfully address linter issues and improve code readability. The modifications are consistent across both the
CalculatorandCalculatorLoggerclasses, enhancing the overall code quality without altering core functionality. These improvements align well with the PR's objectives and contribute to a more maintainable codebase.examples/fastapi-crud/src/alembic_migrations/versions/11bd0063b0af_specified_not_nullable_fields_in_.py (4)
13-14: LGTM: Consistent use of double quotes for string literals.The change from single quotes to double quotes for string literals is consistent with the project's coding style, as evidenced by similar changes in other files mentioned in the AI summary.
35-43: LGTM: Proper rollback of non-null constraints in downgrade function.The
downgradefunction correctly reverts the changes made in theupgradefunction by setting all columns back tonullable=True. This ensures that the migration can be rolled back if needed.
Line range hint
1-45: Summary: Well-structured migration script with improved consistency.This Alembic migration script effectively modifies the
employeetable to enforce non-null constraints on all columns. The changes are consistent with the project's coding style and align with the PR objectives of fixing linter issues and improving code consistency.Key points:
- Non-null constraints added to all columns in the
upgradefunction.- Proper rollback implemented in the
downgradefunction.- Consistent use of double quotes for string literals.
These changes contribute to better data integrity and code quality. Ensure that the application logic and existing data are compatible with these new constraints before applying the migration in production.
21-29: LGTM: Non-null constraints added to employee table columns.The changes enforce data integrity by setting all columns in the
employeetable tonullable=False. This is generally a good practice. However, please ensure that:
- Existing data in the database doesn't contain NULL values in these columns.
- The application logic handles these non-null constraints appropriately.
To verify the impact of these changes, you can run the following script:
This script will help identify any existing NULL values that might cause issues when applying this migration.
examples/fastapi-crud/src/services/employee_service.py (2)
10-10: LGTM: Import organization improved.The relocation of the
Sessionimport improves the overall organization of imports. This change is consistent with similar modifications in other files and adheres to common Python import structuring practices.
Line range hint
1-62: Summary: Linter issues successfully addressed.The changes in this file successfully address linter issues by improving import organization and simplifying loop syntax. These modifications align well with the PR objectives of fixing linter issues and enhancing code readability. The changes are consistent with similar improvements made in other files, as mentioned in the AI summary.
No new functions were added, and the existing functionality remains unchanged, so no additional documentation or tests are required for this file.
examples/cli-typer-base/main.py (6)
7-8: Improved import organizationThe reordering of import statements enhances code readability and complies with common Python style guidelines. This change aligns well with the PR's objective of addressing linter issues.
25-25: Improved code structure and readabilityThe reformatting of the
currenciesfunction signature and the realignment of thematchstatement case blocks enhance code readability and structure. These changes are in line with Python style guidelines and effectively address potential linter issues.Also applies to: 35-44
50-51: Added trailing comma for better maintainabilityThe addition of a trailing comma after the last argument in the
console.printcall is a good practice. It facilitates easier addition of new arguments in the future and can lead to cleaner diffs in version control. This change addresses a common linter recommendation.
67-67: Improved string quote consistencyThe change from single to double quotes in the
console.print_jsoncall enhances code style consistency. This modification aligns with the PR's goal of addressing linter issues and maintains a uniform approach to string literals throughout the codebase.
76-76: Improved code structure with added whitespaceThe addition of an empty line before the
if __name__ == "__main__":block enhances code readability by clearly separating the main execution block from the function definitions. This change aligns with PEP 8 style recommendations and improves overall code structure.
Line range hint
1-77: Overall assessment: Successful linter issue resolutionThe changes made to this file effectively address various linter issues, improving code style, consistency, and readability. The modifications include:
- Reorganized import statements
- Improved function and statement formatting
- Consistent use of string quotes
- Enhanced code structure with appropriate whitespace
These changes align well with the PR's objective of fixing linter issues and adhere to Python style guidelines. The functionality of the code remains unchanged, focusing solely on code quality improvements.
examples/fastapi-simple-docker-pip/app/auth/auth.py (2)
4-5: LGTM: Import statements added correctly.The addition of these import statements for
settingsandUseris appropriate and follows Python conventions. These imports align with the changes in the file that now utilize these modules.
52-59: LGTM: User data handling improved and new field added.The changes to the
get_current_userfunction improve consistency by using double quotes throughout. The addition of theis_premiumfield to theUserobject is noted.Could you please clarify the purpose and implications of the new
is_premiumfield? Are there any associated changes in other parts of the codebase that depend on this new field?To verify the usage of this new field, you can run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: The
is_premiumfield is consistently and correctly implemented.All usages of the
is_premiumfield have been confirmed and align with the intended functionality.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of the is_premium field across the codebase rg "is_premium" --type pyLength of output: 328
examples/fastapi-crud/src/repositories/company_repository.py (2)
6-7: LGTM: Import statements reorganized.The reorganization of import statements improves code readability and follows PEP 8 guidelines. This change is consistent with similar modifications in other files, enhancing overall project consistency.
Line range hint
45-46: Improved error handling increateandpatchmethods.The addition of the exception argument
einDatabaseExceptions.throw_internal_server_error(e)enhances error handling by passing exception details. This change improves consistency across methods and aligns with updates in other files.Also applies to: 65-66
examples/cli-typer-base/services/input_wrapper.py (5)
54-54: LGTM: Improved formatting for multi-line print statementThe addition of a comma at the end of this line improves readability and allows for easier extension of the print statement across multiple lines if needed in the future. This change aligns with common Python style guides.
60-60: LGTM: Improved readability of while loop conditionThe while loop condition has been reformatted to a single line, which improves code readability without changing the logic. This change is in line with the PR's objective of addressing linter issues.
69-69: LGTM: Condensed error message print statementThe error message print statement has been condensed to a single line, improving code conciseness without changing the functionality or the message itself. This change aligns with the PR's goal of addressing linter issues.
76-76: LGTM: Improved formatting for multi-line function callThe addition of a comma after the last parameter in the
ConversionParamsconstructor call improves consistency and allows for easier addition of new parameters in the future if needed. This change aligns with common Python style guides and the PR's objective of addressing linter issues.
Line range hint
1-76: Overall assessment: Successful linter issue resolutionThe changes made to this file successfully address formatting and style issues, improving code readability and maintainability. These modifications are in line with the PR's objective of fixing linter issues. No functional changes were introduced, ensuring that the existing behavior of the code remains intact.
examples/fastapi-crud/src/repositories/employee_repository.py (4)
7-8: LGTM: Import statements reorganized.The import statements for
IntegrityErrorandSessionhave been moved to the top of the file, improving code organization and adhering to PEP 8 guidelines.
Line range hint
69-69: LGTM: Descriptive comment added.The addition of the comment "Deletes an employee record from DB" improves code documentation by clearly stating the purpose of the
deletemethod.
Line range hint
1-89: LGTM: Improved exception handling with logging.The exception handling has been consistently updated across all methods to include logging before throwing exceptions. This enhancement improves error tracking and debugging capabilities, contributing to better maintainability of the code.
Line range hint
1-89: Overall assessment: Good improvements with a minor issue.The changes in this file have generally improved code quality by reorganizing imports, enhancing exception handling with logging, and adding documentation. However, there's a minor issue with an incorrect comment in the
patchmethod that should be addressed. Once this is corrected, the changes will significantly contribute to the maintainability and readability of the code.examples/fastapi-crud/src/alembic_migrations/versions/df8afbc693b9_add_company_model.py (3)
21-36: LGTM: Company model changes are well-structured and improve data integrity.The additions to the
companytable are comprehensive and well-structured. Makingcompany_namenon-nullable and adding a unique constraint to the
43-59: LGTM: Downgrade function correctly reverses all changes.The
downgrade()function accurately reverses all changes made in theupgrade()function, including the removal of theavatar_urlcolumn from theemployeetable. The order of operations is correct, ensuring that dependencies are maintained during the downgrade process.
21-32: Consider handling existing data when adding non-nullable columns.This migration adds several non-nullable columns to the
companytable (e.g.,address,city,state_province,country,zip_code,tax_id). If there's existing data in thecompanytable, this migration might fail unless default values are provided or the existing data is updated.Consider one of the following approaches:
- Provide default values for these columns in the migration.
- Make these columns nullable initially, then update the existing data, and finally alter the columns to be non-nullable.
- If the table is empty or this is a fresh installation, no changes are needed.
Please ensure that this migration will work correctly with your current database state.
| [packages] | ||
| pydantic = "*" | ||
| fastapi = "*" | ||
| pydantic-settings = "*" | ||
| mangum = "*" | ||
| httpx = "*" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider specifying version ranges for production dependencies.
While using "*" for package versions allows for the latest updates, it may lead to unexpected behavior or compatibility issues in the future. For production dependencies, it's generally recommended to specify version ranges or pin specific versions.
Consider updating the [packages] section to include version ranges. For example:
[packages]
pydantic = ">=2.0,<3.0"
fastapi = ">=0.100.0,<1.0.0"
pydantic-settings = ">=2.0,<3.0"
mangum = ">=0.17.0,<1.0.0"
httpx = ">=0.24.0,<1.0.0"
This ensures compatibility while still allowing for minor updates and bug fixes.
| [dev-packages] | ||
| pre-commit = "*" | ||
| pytest = "*" | ||
| black = "*" | ||
| flake8 = "*" | ||
| pylint = "*" | ||
| mypy = "*" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Dev dependencies align well with project needs; consider version specifications.
The development dependencies listed align well with the project's linting and testing needs, and they correspond to the configurations in .flake8 and .pre-commit-config.yaml.
For better reproducibility of the development environment, consider specifying version ranges for these packages as well. For example:
[dev-packages]
pre-commit = ">=3.0.0,<4.0.0"
pytest = ">=7.0.0,<8.0.0"
black = ">=23.0.0,<24.0.0"
flake8 = ">=6.0.0,<7.0.0"
pylint = ">=2.17.0,<3.0.0"
mypy = ">=1.0.0,<2.0.0"
This ensures consistent behavior across different development environments while still allowing for minor updates and bug fixes.
| op.drop_index("ix_company_id", table_name="company") | ||
| op.create_index(op.f("ix_company_id"), "company", ["id"], unique=True) | ||
| op.create_unique_constraint(None, "company", ["email"]) | ||
| op.add_column("employee", sa.Column("avatar_url", sa.String(), nullable=True)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider separating employee-related changes into a different migration.
The addition of the avatar_url column to the employee table seems unrelated to the company model changes. It might be better to separate this into a different migration for clarity and easier management of database schema changes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
examples/fastapi-simple-docker-pip/scripts/easy-options/easyoptions.sh (1)
Line range hint
1-233: Consider the broader impact of project-wide changesWhile the change in this file is minor and beneficial, it's important to note the broader context of this PR:
- The introduction of a Pipfile might affect the environment in which this script runs. Ensure that any dependencies required by this script are properly managed.
- Updates to linting configurations (.flake8) and pre-commit hooks might impact future contributions to this script. Consider running these new checks on this file to ensure full compliance.
- These changes align with the PR objective of fixing linter issues. It might be worthwhile to run the updated linter on this script to catch any other potential issues.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/workflows/lint.yml (2 hunks)
- examples/fastapi-simple-docker-pip/scripts/easy-options/easyoptions.sh (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (8)
.github/workflows/lint.yml (7)
1-2: Workflow name update looks good.The change from "Lint Code Base" to "Super Linter" accurately reflects the tool being used and aligns with the updated linter action.
13-15: Permissions update is appropriate.The added permissions at both the workflow and job levels are necessary for the Super Linter to function correctly. These changes allow the linter to comment on pull requests and access required information.
Also applies to: 22-24
33-58: Python environment setup looks comprehensive.The added steps for setting up the Python environment, including pipenv installation and dependency management, ensure a consistent and isolated environment for linting. This approach is robust and follows best practices for Python projects.
61-61: Linter action update to v6 is good.Updating to the latest version of the Super Linter action is beneficial for accessing new features and bug fixes. However, it's important to ensure this update doesn't introduce any breaking changes.
Please verify that the linter runs successfully with this update by checking the workflow run results or running it locally if possible.
64-72: Environment variable updates look good.The changes to environment variables, particularly setting
VALIDATE_ALL_CODEBASEto true and specifying configuration files for various linting tools, enhance the linting process. ThePYTHONPATHvariable ensures proper access to project dependencies.Please confirm that all the specified configuration files (
.markdownlint.json,pyproject.toml) exist in the repository and contain the appropriate linting rules.
73-80: Please clarify the rationale for disabled validations.Several validation checks have been disabled, including BASH, Dockerfile, YAML, and others. While this may be necessary to avoid false positives or irrelevant checks, it's important to ensure that critical checks are not being skipped.
Could you please provide the reasoning behind disabling these specific validations? Are there alternative checks in place for these file types?
Line range hint
1-80: Overall, the changes to the linting workflow are comprehensive and beneficial.The updates to this workflow file significantly enhance the linting process by:
- Using the latest version of Super Linter
- Implementing proper Python environment setup with pipenv
- Customizing linting rules through specific configuration files
- Ensuring comprehensive codebase validation
These changes should lead to more thorough and project-specific linting, potentially improving code quality and consistency. However, please address the points raised in the previous comments, particularly regarding the disabled validations and verification of configuration files.
examples/fastapi-simple-docker-pip/scripts/easy-options/easyoptions.sh (1)
112-112: Approved: Improved integer comparison in BashThe change from
>to-gtfor comparing the length ofoption_varis a good improvement. It follows Bash best practices for integer comparisons in conditional statements. This change enhances code clarity and reduces potential issues that might arise from string comparisons in numeric contexts.
What's this PR do?
Summary of changes in this PR or what it accomplishes.
@ulises-jeremias @matiasz8
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
/healthzfor service status monitoring.UserFactoryfor generating user instances with random data.CompanyFactoryfor generating company instances with random data.EmailSettingsclass to manage email configuration settings.Bug Fixes
NewCompanySchemaandPatchCompanySchemato disallow extra fields.Documentation
black,pylint,pytest, andmypy.Style
Chores