206 fix tag related info msg

[ShiriMoran]

No description provided.

[adisos]

I still see several issues:

(1) getting warning such as "expr ((( members IDs: )) of group .... is either illegal or not supported by the POC"
this does not indicate what is the issue with the group expr.. and long id better be removed from the message.

(2) "is either illegal or not supported by the POC" should be rephrased.. can specify which one is relevant? illegal / not supported? + remove "POC" , just say not supported. (should also update doc what is supported / not supported) .

(3) getting many warning duplications

(4) change expr ((Name Of VirtualMachine CONTAINS New)) to expr (Name Of VirtualMachine CONTAINS New)

(5) empty expr str should be removed (expr () of group ... -> change to expr of group...)

(6) expr (to implement) of group should be changed to expr of group...

[ShiriMoran]

I still see several issues:

(1) getting warning such as "expr ((( members IDs: )) of group .... is either illegal or not supported by the POC" this does not indicate what is the issue with the group expr.. and long id better be removed from the message.

Where did you get members IDs? it should be part of the message

I thought that for the POC its enough, and we don't need all the details. The README will include what is supported.
If needed I'll revisit it.

(2) "is either illegal or not supported by the POC" should be rephrased.. can specify which one is relevant? illegal / not
supported? + remove "POC" , just say not supported. (should also update doc what is supported / not supported) .

Same comment as above.

(3) getting many warning duplications

This seems to be #213

(4) change expr ((Name Of VirtualMachine CONTAINS New)) to expr (Name Of VirtualMachine CONTAINS New)

This is result of expr's String() and is not related to this PR. If needed, open another issue.

(5) empty expr str should be removed (expr () of group ... -> change to expr of group...)

This seems another instance of #213

(6) expr (to implement) of group should be changed to expr of group...

Perhaps the best way to handle this is extend expr's string(); lets open an issue for this and for 4

[ShiriMoran]

will revisit in a fresh branch after #213 is fixed