docs: Remove alternatives page from user guide #13766
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
r-brink
requested review from
ritchie46,
stinodego and
c-peters
as code owners
github-actions
bot
added
documentation
|
Will rewrite the chapter in the near future and close this one for now |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Suggestion to remove the
alternativespage from the guide. The analysis is not adding a lot of value in my opinion as it is only a high level overview of differences between the solutions and Polars.It would be more valuable to write a chapter about the strengths and weaknesses of Polars and use potential other solutions as examples as reference.
Related to #13626