Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Use tikv-jemallocator #21486

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 28, 2025
Merged

Conversation

stijnherfst
Copy link
Collaborator

The jemallocator crate mentions to use tikv-jemallocator instead which is otherwise identical.

@github-actions github-actions bot added internal An internal refactor or improvement python Related to Python Polars rust Related to Rust Polars labels Feb 27, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 27, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 79.81%. Comparing base (69612d4) to head (fa43cf9).
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #21486   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   79.81%   79.81%           
=======================================
  Files        1592     1592           
  Lines      229268   229268           
  Branches     2623     2623           
=======================================
+ Hits       182987   182992    +5     
+ Misses      45676    45671    -5     
  Partials      605      605           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ritchie46
Copy link
Member

Can you fix CI?

@ritchie46 ritchie46 merged commit e8ee335 into pola-rs:main Feb 28, 2025
27 checks passed
anath2 pushed a commit to anath2/polars that referenced this pull request Mar 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
internal An internal refactor or improvement python Related to Python Polars rust Related to Rust Polars
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants