Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Attempt to fix publishing steps #115

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 3, 2025
Merged

Attempt to fix publishing steps #115

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 3, 2025

Conversation

lunaris
Copy link
Contributor

@lunaris lunaris commented Mar 3, 2025

The publishing steps in this repository have been broken for a while now, due to a mismatch when extracted artifacts produced by GoReleaser. Specifically, ARM64 artifacts now end up with an appended MIPS version, which for us appears to always be 8.0. It's not clear to me when this mismatch was first introduced, though I suspect it was triggered by some new GoReleaser version being pulled by the action (since we don't pin a version) and has been broken ever since. In this change I've modified the expected filenames (I believe), which I think will fix things, though someone reviewing this may have a better idea/a real solution if this is just symptom curing.

Note

It appears that the alpine entry has been using ARM64 binaries,
despite being listed as an x64 architecture, so I've changed this.
Is this correct?

The publishing steps in this repository have been broken for a while
now, due to a mismatch when extracted artifacts produced by GoReleaser.
Specifically, ARM64 artifacts now end up with an appended MIPS version,
which for us appears to always be 8.0. It's not clear to me when this
mismatch was first introduced, though I suspect it was triggered by some
new GoReleaser version being pulled by the action (since we don't pin a
version) and has been broken ever since. In this change I've modified
the expected filenames (I believe), which I think will fix things,
though someone reviewing this may have a better idea/a real solution if
this is just symptom curing.

> [!NOTE]
> It appears that the `alpine` entry has been using ARM64 binaries,
> despite being listed as an `x64` architecture, so I've changed this.
> Is this correct?
Copy link
Member

@iwahbe iwahbe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's give it a shot.

@lunaris lunaris added the impact/no-changelog-required This issue doesn't require a CHANGELOG update label Mar 3, 2025
@lunaris lunaris merged commit c74e0e3 into main Mar 3, 2025
5 checks passed
@lunaris lunaris deleted the wjones/fix-publish branch March 3, 2025 14:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
impact/no-changelog-required This issue doesn't require a CHANGELOG update
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants