Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Resolve implicit access rules requirements #826

Merged
merged 33 commits into from
Feb 14, 2025

Conversation

PawelPawelec-RDX
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 11, 2025

Docker tags
docker.io/radixdlt/private-babylon-ng-database-migrations:HEAD-9fd0073-arm64

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 11, 2025

Docker tags
docker.io/radixdlt/private-babylon-ng-gateway-api:HEAD-9fd0073-arm64

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 11, 2025

Docker tags
docker.io/radixdlt/private-babylon-ng-data-aggregator:HEAD-9fd0073-arm64

@PawelPawelec-RDX PawelPawelec-RDX marked this pull request as ready for review February 12, 2025 12:20
Copy link
Contributor

@dhedey dhedey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice work!

I have a couple of important comments, but mainly it's just minor docs tweaks.

@PawelPawelec-RDX PawelPawelec-RDX force-pushed the resolve-implicit-access-rules-requirements branch from 876cfc6 to b855a98 Compare February 13, 2025 12:26
@PawelPawelec-RDX PawelPawelec-RDX force-pushed the resolve-implicit-access-rules-requirements branch from 9cf48be to 89f6c54 Compare February 14, 2025 14:51
…nsions.cs

Co-authored-by: David Edey <david.edey@rdx.works>
@PawelPawelec-RDX PawelPawelec-RDX merged commit fa299cd into develop Feb 14, 2025
4 checks passed
@PawelPawelec-RDX PawelPawelec-RDX deleted the resolve-implicit-access-rules-requirements branch February 14, 2025 19:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants