-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 346
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[JTC] Renaming variables, reordering trajectory checks #1032
Conversation
This pull request is in conflict. Could you fix it @destogl? |
Recently merged the wraparound feature which caused some conflicts. Also, this may be interesting for @fmauch |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM and improves readability!
👀 @destogl |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, apart from the following minor comment.
Now with the changes, it looks clear and good
joint_trajectory_controller/src/joint_trajectory_controller.cpp
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Please adjust / extend the tests |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This includes #780, which has the same failing test: test_no_jump_when_state_tracking_error_not_updated
This pull request is in conflict. Could you fix it @destogl? |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1032 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 84.76% 84.75% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 124 124
Lines 11444 11443 -1
Branches 967 967
==========================================
- Hits 9700 9699 -1
Misses 1432 1432
Partials 312 312
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
in general, LGTM
2 minor comments, it is also not a problem not addressing them
joint_trajectory_controller/src/joint_trajectory_controller.cpp
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
joint_trajectory_controller/src/joint_trajectory_controller.cpp
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Sai Kishor Kothakota <sai.kishor@pal-robotics.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@christophfroehlich it seems the downstream builds are failing from the UR drivers scaled JTC. Shall we inform Felix? |
The changes are simple, I can open a PR for the ur_controllers |
This PR increseas readability of the JTC by renaming trajectory varialbes to be semantically correct and self explainable.
Also it reoders checks of the trajectories done in the callback. They are grouped based on the things they are checking, i.e., 1. data available, 2. time checks; 3. trajectory point checks.
Additionally, it adds "last_commanded_time_" for the open loop mode to be more correct when setting point before trajectory.#780