Unrolled build for rust-lang#137632

Rollup merge of rust-lang#137632 - RalfJung:rustdoc-target-features, r=workingjubilee

rustdoc: when merging target features, keep the highest stability

This addresses rust-lang#137366. (Not closing since we might consider a backport.)

rustdoc wants to pretend that it runs for all targets at once and has all target features, so `tcx.rust_target_features()` will actually be all the target features. For target features that exist on multiple targets, the stability info for one of the targets will be picked (first or last in the list, I guess). All the code consuming that query has to be aware that the data is basically nonsense when running in rustdoc, but the logic checking for unstable or forbidden `#[target_feature]` attributes was not aware of that.

This PR makes the  `tcx.rust_target_features()` info in rustdoc slightly less nonsensical (and decidedly less random) by having the "most stable" target feature take precedent. That deals with rust-lang#137366 (a conflict between a stable and a "forbidden" target feature of the same name for different targets), and also deals with the situation (that we did not seem to have yet) of a conflict between a stable and an unstable target feature of the same name. Note that if there are two unstable target features of the same name, rustdoc might still require the "wrong" nightly feature to be enabled -- but this can only possibly affect unstable code so I guess we can wait until that actually happens, and then someone will have to rewrite this entire thing to be less hacky.

compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/target_features.rs

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ use rustc_middle::query::Providers;
 use rustc_middle::ty::TyCtxt;
 use rustc_session::parse::feature_err;
 use rustc_span::{Span, Symbol, sym};
-use rustc_target::target_features;
+use rustc_target::target_features::{self, Stability};
 
 use crate::errors;
 
@@ -87,12 +87,17 @@ pub(crate) fn from_target_feature_attr(
                     // But ensure the ABI does not forbid enabling this.
                     // Here we do assume that LLVM doesn't add even more implied features
                     // we don't know about, at least no features that would have ABI effects!
-                    if abi_feature_constraints.incompatible.contains(&name.as_str()) {
-                        tcx.dcx().emit_err(errors::ForbiddenTargetFeatureAttr {
-                            span: item.span(),
-                            feature: name.as_str(),
-                            reason: "this feature is incompatible with the target ABI",
-                        });
+                    // We skip this logic in rustdoc, where we want to allow all target features of
+                    // all targets, so we can't check their ABI compatibility and anyway we are not
+                    // generating code so "it's fine".
+                    if !tcx.sess.opts.actually_rustdoc {
+                        if abi_feature_constraints.incompatible.contains(&name.as_str()) {
+                            tcx.dcx().emit_err(errors::ForbiddenTargetFeatureAttr {
+                                span: item.span(),
+                                feature: name.as_str(),
+                                reason: "this feature is incompatible with the target ABI",
+                            });
+                        }
                     }
                     target_features.push(TargetFeature { name, implied: name != feature_sym })
                 }
@@ -142,11 +147,38 @@ pub(crate) fn provide(providers: &mut Providers) {
         rust_target_features: |tcx, cnum| {
             assert_eq!(cnum, LOCAL_CRATE);
             if tcx.sess.opts.actually_rustdoc {
-                // rustdoc needs to be able to document functions that use all the features, so
-                // whitelist them all
-                rustc_target::target_features::all_rust_features()
-                    .map(|(a, b)| (a.to_string(), b))
-                    .collect()
+                // HACK: rustdoc would like to pretend that we have all the target features, so we
+                // have to merge all the lists into one. To ensure an unstable target never prevents
+                // a stable one from working, we merge the stability info of all instances of the
+                // same target feature name, with the "most stable" taking precedence. And then we
+                // hope that this doesn't cause issues anywhere else in the compiler...
+                let mut result: UnordMap<String, Stability> = Default::default();
+                for (name, stability) in rustc_target::target_features::all_rust_features() {
+                    use std::collections::hash_map::Entry;
+                    match result.entry(name.to_owned()) {
+                        Entry::Vacant(vacant_entry) => {
+                            vacant_entry.insert(stability);
+                        }
+                        Entry::Occupied(mut occupied_entry) => {
+                            // Merge the two stabilities, "more stable" taking precedence.
+                            match (occupied_entry.get(), stability) {
+                                (Stability::Stable, _)
+                                | (
+                                    Stability::Unstable { .. },
+                                    Stability::Unstable { .. } | Stability::Forbidden { .. },
+                                )
+                                | (Stability::Forbidden { .. }, Stability::Forbidden { .. }) => {
+                                    // The stability in the entry is at least as good as the new one, just keep it.
+                                }
+                                _ => {
+                                    // Overwrite stabilite.
+                                    occupied_entry.insert(stability);
+                                }
+                            }
+                        }
+                    }
+                }
+                result
             } else {
                 tcx.sess
                     .target

tests/rustdoc-ui/target-feature-stability.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+//! This is a regression test for <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/137366>, ensuring
+//! that we can use the `neon` target feature on ARM32 targets in rustdoc despite there
+//! being a "forbidden" feature of the same name for aarch64, and rustdoc merging the
+//! target features of all targets.
+//@ check-pass
+//@ revisions: arm aarch64
+//@[arm] compile-flags: --target armv7-unknown-linux-gnueabihf
+//@[arm] needs-llvm-components: arm
+//@[aarch64] compile-flags: --target aarch64-unknown-none-softfloat
+//@[aarch64] needs-llvm-components: aarch64
+
+#![crate_type = "lib"]
+#![feature(no_core, lang_items)]
+#![feature(arm_target_feature)]
+#![no_core]
+
+#[lang = "sized"]
+pub trait Sized {}
+
+// `fp-armv8` is "forbidden" on aarch64 as we tie it to `neon`.
+#[target_feature(enable = "fp-armv8")]
+pub fn fun1() {}
+
+// This would usually be rejected as it changes the ABI.
+// But we disable that check in rustdoc since we are building "for all targets" and the
+// check can't really handle that.
+#[target_feature(enable = "soft-float")]
+pub fn fun2() {}