Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(blockifier_test_utils): move RunnableCairo1 from blockifier::test_utils and update dependencies #3969

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: graphite-base/3969
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rotem-starkware
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@reviewable-StarkWare
Copy link

This change is Reviewable

@rotem-starkware rotem-starkware marked this pull request as ready for review February 5, 2025 11:25
Copy link
Collaborator

@dorimedini-starkware dorimedini-starkware left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed 44 of 44 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @AvivYossef-starkware and @rotem-starkware)


crates/blockifier_test_utils/Cargo.toml line 10 at r1 (raw file):

[features]
cairo_native = []

the blockifier Cargo.toml needs to be updated: if it's cairo_native feature is active, then the blockifier_test_utils cairo_native feature also needs to beactive

Code quote:

[features]
cairo_native = []

@rotem-starkware rotem-starkware changed the base branch from rotem/move_blockifier_test_utils_cairo_compile to graphite-base/3969 February 5, 2025 14:54
@rotem-starkware rotem-starkware force-pushed the rotem/move_blockifier_test_utils_runnablecairo1 branch from 653fa02 to 2db9ddb Compare February 6, 2025 09:26
@rotem-starkware
Copy link
Contributor Author

crates/blockifier_test_utils/Cargo.toml line 10 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, dorimedini-starkware wrote…

the blockifier Cargo.toml needs to be updated: if it's cairo_native feature is active, then the blockifier_test_utils cairo_native feature also needs to beactive

Done.

@rotem-starkware rotem-starkware force-pushed the rotem/move_blockifier_test_utils_runnablecairo1 branch 4 times, most recently from 3103892 to 2dc9eff Compare February 6, 2025 12:27
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2025

Benchmark movements:
tree_computation_flow performance improved 😺
tree_computation_flow time: [35.465 ms 35.515 ms 35.580 ms]
change: [-4.0964% -2.4546% -1.0461%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
Performance has improved.
Found 3 outliers among 100 measurements (3.00%)
2 (2.00%) high mild
1 (1.00%) high severe

Copy link
Collaborator

@dorimedini-starkware dorimedini-starkware left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:lgtm:

Reviewed 5 of 5 files at r2, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @AvivYossef-starkware)

@rotem-starkware rotem-starkware force-pushed the rotem/move_blockifier_test_utils_runnablecairo1 branch from 2dc9eff to 9d7c4fa Compare February 6, 2025 14:49
Copy link
Collaborator

@dorimedini-starkware dorimedini-starkware left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed 22 of 22 files at r3, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @AvivYossef-starkware)

@rotem-starkware rotem-starkware force-pushed the rotem/move_blockifier_test_utils_runnablecairo1 branch from 9d7c4fa to 902ddee Compare February 6, 2025 15:00
Copy link
Collaborator

@dorimedini-starkware dorimedini-starkware left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed 7 of 7 files at r4, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @AvivYossef-starkware)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants