Merge multiprocess into dev #160
Conversation
ken4647
commented
Dec 25, 2024
•
ken4647
commented
- support Multiprocess for aarch64 in EL1 support Multiprocess for aarch64 in EL1 #142
- add unixsocket without real inode add unixsocket without real inode #145
- add poll state POLLHUP add poll stete POLLHUP #159
- support loopback Multiprocess loopback #158
Merge dev into main
Merge dev into main
Merge dev into main
Merge dev into main
support Multiprocess for aarch64 in EL1
fix bugs for multiprocess in aarch64.
Multiprocess loopback
add unixsocket without real inode
fix bug for unexpected pagefault when nested fork.
add unix socket drop
Multiprocess loopback
add poll stete POLLHUP
| #[cfg(not(feature = "fs"))] | ||
| unsafe { | ||
| dst.write_bytes(0, size); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is there misuse of tab and block?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
these tab and blocks is generated by cmd make fmt. I think it is OK?
| removing_vaddr.push(vaddr); | ||
| off_pool.push(off); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why del off_pool in release_pages_mapped
There was a problem hiding this comment.
it may be removed by mistask, and it should not be removed there. I have fix it in latest commit.
api/ruxos_posix_api/src/imp/pipe.rs
Outdated
| @@ -112,7 +116,9 @@ impl Pipe { | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| pub fn write_end_close(&self) -> bool { | |||
| Arc::strong_count(&self.buffer) == 1 | |||
| let write_end_count = Arc::weak_count(&self.buffer); | |||
| // error!("Pipe::write_end_close <= buffer: {:#?} {:#?}", write_end_count, Arc::as_ptr(&self.buffer)); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should we del this comment?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yes, I will remove it soon
| @@ -8,8 +8,9 @@ | |||
| */ | |||
|
|
|||
| const fn align_up(val: usize) -> usize { | |||
| const PAGE_SIZE: usize = 0x1000; | |||
| (val + PAGE_SIZE - 1) & !(PAGE_SIZE - 1) | |||
| // should be the same as align_size in percpu. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is this align_size fixed? use config may be beffter?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
it should be same with the size in linker.ld.s. it is not easy to add into ruxconfig, as it is at the level of crate, while ruxconfig is at the level of module, which is higher than level crate.
there are anthoer change is add loopback device #158 |
ken4647
force-pushed
the
dev
branch
5 times, most recently
from
6b4a4cc to
c75a5d9
Compare
