Create codeql.yml

[thatguyinabeanie]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Introduced a new GitHub Actions workflow for advanced CodeQL analysis, enhancing code security and quality checks.
• Documentation
  • Added comments and guidance for users on customizing the analysis settings and handling build commands.

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a new GitHub Actions workflow file called codeql.yml, which is set up for advanced CodeQL analysis of code repositories. It triggers on pushes and pull requests to the main branch, as well as on a scheduled basis. The workflow supports multiple programming languages and runs on different operating systems tailored to the specific language. It includes steps for repository checkout, CodeQL tool initialization, and analysis execution, with guidance for customization and handling build issues.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
.github/workflows/codeql.yml	Added a new workflow for CodeQL analysis, including triggers, job definitions, and configuration steps.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant GitHub
    participant CodeQL

    User->>GitHub: Push code or create pull request
    GitHub->>CodeQL: Trigger CodeQL Analysis
    CodeQL->>CodeQL: Initialize tools and checkout repo
    CodeQL->>CodeQL: Run analysis on specified languages
    alt Analysis successful
        CodeQL->>GitHub: Report results
    else Build issues
        CodeQL->>User: Prompt for manual build commands
    end

Loading

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@thatguyinabeanie has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 16 minutes and 59 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a566882 and 3af2e76.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.68%. Comparing base (a566882) to head (3af2e76).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #559   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.68%   93.68%           
=======================================
  Files          72       72           
  Lines        1726     1726           
  Branches      301      301           
=======================================
  Hits         1617     1617           
  Misses        109      109           

Flag	Coverage Δ
rspec	93.68% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.